˿

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 13 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 401 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Tim Eagle

There is a new power that allows national park authorities to impose fixed-penalty notices. Does anybody have any comments on that?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Dog Theft (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Tim Eagle

The Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee has recommended that the affirmative procedure should apply to the power allowing Scottish ministers to add to the category of “assistance dog”. Currently, the negative procedure would apply. Can you explain your thinking as to why the negative procedure would be proportionate and appropriate in this case?

11:45  

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Dog Theft (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Tim Eagle

Maurice, in your letter to the committee, you say that a statutory offence would be used more than the common law offence of theft is used at the moment. You give breach of the peace as an example of that. What benefits do you see in having a statutory offence rather than a common-law offence?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Tim Eagle

Fair enough.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Tim Eagle

The policy memorandum highlights things such as forestry and offshore and onshore wind. There is the ability to change specific things within the habitats regulations, such as the broader concept of climate change. I think that I agree with you, but I am just playing devil’s advocate. Is that not what the Scottish Government is trying to do—to give it that power? If it wanted that, what would be the backstop? How could you secure that? Should we remove part 2 in its entirety, or could there be a risk in doing that? What would be the backstop if we were to leave in part 2?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Tim Eagle

۱—aDZܳٱ.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Tim Eagle

If they are not ranked, it would not matter if we moved them around a bit.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Tim Eagle

That very question had occurred to me, too. I was a bit worried about the SSI’s potential broadness, but my understanding is exactly as you have said. At the moment, the regulations allow such measures only within the avian context, but if the disease moves into mammals, the SSI will give a veterinarian the ability to say, “Actually, we need to close down these premises, because of the risk that it has now moved into X species and we need to prevent it from moving elsewhere.” I now feel secure about what is proposed—I do not think that the provisions would be abused. Indeed, I would be very surprised if that were to be the case.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Tim Eagle

Where a conflict exists.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Tim Eagle

In the policy memorandum, the Scottish Government sets out clearly that it feels that there is a massive gap here. However, we had the academics in last week, and I think that they, and pretty much all of you, are saying that you think completely differently. To go back to your point, Dan, what is the Scottish Government suggesting that it needs following our withdrawal from the European Union that you say is not required?