The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 401 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Tim Eagle
There is a new power that allows national park authorities to impose fixed-penalty notices. Does anybody have any comments on that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Tim Eagle
The Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee has recommended that the affirmative procedure should apply to the power allowing Scottish ministers to add to the category of “assistance dog”. Currently, the negative procedure would apply. Can you explain your thinking as to why the negative procedure would be proportionate and appropriate in this case?
11:45Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Tim Eagle
Maurice, in your letter to the committee, you say that a statutory offence would be used more than the common law offence of theft is used at the moment. You give breach of the peace as an example of that. What benefits do you see in having a statutory offence rather than a common-law offence?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Tim Eagle
Fair enough.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Tim Eagle
The policy memorandum highlights things such as forestry and offshore and onshore wind. There is the ability to change specific things within the habitats regulations, such as the broader concept of climate change. I think that I agree with you, but I am just playing devil’s advocate. Is that not what the Scottish Government is trying to do—to give it that power? If it wanted that, what would be the backstop? How could you secure that? Should we remove part 2 in its entirety, or could there be a risk in doing that? What would be the backstop if we were to leave in part 2?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Tim Eagle
۱—aDZܳٱ.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Tim Eagle
If they are not ranked, it would not matter if we moved them around a bit.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Tim Eagle
That very question had occurred to me, too. I was a bit worried about the SSI’s potential broadness, but my understanding is exactly as you have said. At the moment, the regulations allow such measures only within the avian context, but if the disease moves into mammals, the SSI will give a veterinarian the ability to say, “Actually, we need to close down these premises, because of the risk that it has now moved into X species and we need to prevent it from moving elsewhere.” I now feel secure about what is proposed—I do not think that the provisions would be abused. Indeed, I would be very surprised if that were to be the case.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Tim Eagle
Where a conflict exists.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Tim Eagle
In the policy memorandum, the Scottish Government sets out clearly that it feels that there is a massive gap here. However, we had the academics in last week, and I think that they, and pretty much all of you, are saying that you think completely differently. To go back to your point, Dan, what is the Scottish Government suggesting that it needs following our withdrawal from the European Union that you say is not required?