The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 348 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Tim Eagle
I should have said that criteria are also important in that code. Are you aware of the financial memorandum and that it lays out how many times you expect to use the new powers under nature restoration?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Tim Eagle
I have to clip my little flock of sheep soon, and, a bit like that, it all seems just a wee bit woolly for me. It is about clarity and understanding. Earlier, you mentioned case studies and the code of practice. With regard to what restoration means for one holding and then the holding next to it, and so on, will you give that guarantee that you will put not just case studies but clear guidance with the code of practice and work with the sector to ensure that we know what it means?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Tim Eagle
I have a couple of final questions. The first is around the business and regulatory impact assessment, or BRIA. I have not yet seen one or found one. Do you know whether that has been done or is being done? When we might see that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Tim Eagle
The issue here is about overreaching. It is not about the impacts of section 8 not being adhered to. If a new owner were to come in and say, “I agree with all of that,” in order for the land sale to proceed, because the land price could be affected, should the bill provide that NatureScot could de-escalate the requirement to an agreement, rather than the land having to be sold with a control scheme in place? Does that make sense?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Tim Eagle
What is NatureScot’s relationship with the code? I ask that because my understanding is that, under the 1996 act, you had to “have regard to” the code of practice. I am not quite clear now. In some parts, I think that “have regard to” has gone, but it remains in section 5 of the 1996 act. That is not particularly strong, is it? You have to have regard to, but it does not matter. In your minds, will NatureScot work to the code that is produced?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Tim Eagle
I looked up a definition, which I have here. It says that
“Case law from 2014 notes that to have regard to a matter means simply that that matter must be specifically considered not that it must be given greater weight than other matters.”
Some stakeholders are coming to me and saying, “I don’t know what NatureScot is going to do with the code of practice.” I think that they need the explicit knowledge that everything that you write in it will be built with them and that it will also be what you follow.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Tim Eagle
Good morning. This is an interesting discussion. Part of the problem with framework bills is that they are not defined. The stakeholders do not know what is going on. I have a few questions about the code of practice, because I think that it will be instrumental in helping everyone to understand what the bill will do. Section 12 of the bill changes when NatureScot can review compliance with and the effectiveness of the code of practice for deer management. How will you decide when is an appropriate time to carry out a review?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Tim Eagle
I have one more quick question. Do you think it would be better to change “have regard to” in the bill to “comply with” because that might give certainty to stakeholders? Also, as the convener mentioned, do you think that it would have been better if a draft code had been published along with the bill, because the framework nature of the bill means that we do not really know what we are talking about here?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Tim Eagle
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Tim Eagle
I appreciate that you only just got that letter, but once you have had the chance to review it, is it right that your position might change? You might decide to come back and say, “Actually, we’re fully supportive of this bill.”