The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 348 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Tim Eagle
What was not there previously? You are right that any council or local person could have fed into a national park plan through a consultation process, so why is the change necessary?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Tim Eagle
Thank you all for your interesting answers—the subject came up significantly in committee last week and I want to be clear in my mind that, by not allowing powers, we are not restricting what we need to do for biodiversity, climate change and so on. I do not think that any of us would want to see that.
My main question was going to be on the purposes for which the regulations could be changed but, to be absolutely clear, do all of you agree that it is not about the purposes that are set out in the policy memorandum but about the fact that, fundamentally, the power should not be there? Does that make sense? Dan, you mentioned the various purposes that the Government sets out in the policy memorandum, such as ensuring consistency or compatibility with other legal regimes or taking account of changes in technology and so on, but would you not add to or amend those purposes?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Tim Eagle
Let us go back to the points that Bruce Wilson and Nick Hesford made. My worry—which the convener picked up on, too—is that the aspect that we are discussing is listed in subsection (2)(f), which talks about the local community and the economic development of national parks. One of the early criticisms when the bill was published was about the fact that a national park is surely at its best when we recognise the people who live and work within it and the fact that, although the aims are not listed in order of priority, when people see a list, they automatically think, “We’re down at the bottom, so all the other stuff is more important.”
Are you concerned about that at all? You mentioned the Sandford principle. I may not know it well enough, but the principle is that conservation will take priority over public enjoyment of the park, is it not?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Tim Eagle
They are in the first four.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Tim Eagle
Fair enough.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Tim Eagle
The policy memorandum highlights things such as forestry and offshore and onshore wind. There is the ability to change specific things within the habitats regulations, such as the broader concept of climate change. I think that I agree with you, but I am just playing devil’s advocate. Is that not what the Scottish Government is trying to do—to give it that power? If it wanted that, what would be the backstop? How could you secure that? Should we remove part 2 in its entirety, or could there be a risk in doing that? What would be the backstop if we were to leave in part 2?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Tim Eagle
۱—aDZܳٱ.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Tim Eagle
If they are not ranked, it would not matter if we moved them around a bit.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Tim Eagle
This morning, we have been driving at that bigger picture. You cannot do things in isolation; it is about having a collaborative approach over whole landscapes.
I will move on to my next question. Through the bill, the Scottish Government is taking a delegated power and saying, “We can have full control over this through secondary legislation.” Framework legislation is a nightmare because, on the one hand, it is adaptable, you can easily move things behind the scenes and you can respond quickly, but it also brings problems economically, because businesses have no certainty over how things might change over time. Do you have any thoughts on whether that power in the bill is necessary?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Tim Eagle
Good morning, and thank you for your answers so far. We have slightly touched on this point already, but I was looking at the English report that came out about sites of special scientific interest and SPAs and I noted that more and more of them are in an unfavourable condition. These are important pieces of legislation that are designed specifically to target species, whatever the impact on the wider landscape, but is there is a problem there? In relation to this bill, what are we looking at?
My second question will be about the devolved power, but, first, what is causing that problem and what can we do in this bill? I presume that the situation in Scotland is similar.