The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 778 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
No, that is fine. The second part was about transparency and accountability, and I think that you covered that鈥攗nless you want to add more detail.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
For completeness, how are their budgets allocated and how is scrutiny of the Crown entities done?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
Where does scrutiny of their performance and functions go?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
Brilliant鈥攖hank you very much.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
So, for example, the rent for their premises would come out of their budgets. The premises are not provided directly by the Parliament or through Government buildings. Is that correct?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
One of the topics that we have been talking about is the constituent experience. If you have a problem鈥攊f something has gone wrong with a public service鈥攚here do you go? In Scotland, the question is whether you speak to the ombudsman or the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland. How does that work in New Zealand? If something has gone wrong, how does a New Zealand citizen know where to go? Is there a front page, a dashboard or a one-stop shop from which they can be correctly directed to the Ombudsman or the Human Rights Commission, for example?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
I have a question that is more for my own interest, if the convener will allow it.
One of the conversations that we have been having in the committee is about proactive and reactive work that commissioners do. The Ombudsman deals with something that has gone wrong, but whose job is it to do the research and have the foresight to see something before it goes wrong?
To put that in context, the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman, for example, can react to complaints that she has heard of. However, if she receives complaints about two local authorities, she does not have the powers to start an investigation into all local authorities. Even though she might have the idea that there is a more general problem, she does not have the power to examine it in a more investigative way with the intention of preventing future problems. Do you have any bodies that have that sort of proactive prevention role?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
I am jumping around a little bit, but I will go back to the convener鈥檚 point about budgets. You have explained a bit about the process of the Officers of Parliament Committee working annually to set those budgets. How is the transparency and accountability of those allocations achieved? You said that you could add more detail on that.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
Understood. That is the direction that I was going to travel in on the scrutiny role.
I am also curious about independent Crown entities. One of the challenges that we face in Scotland is that we have a proliferation of SPCB-supported bodies, which are our equivalent of the officers of Parliament. That is the case in the public sector landscape in general, and we are trying to get our heads around it. Have you noticed the same phenomenon with your independent Crown entities? How do they fit into the system?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Lorna Slater
Dr Wilson, I will now get into the more practical operational questions about things such as shared offices, information technology systems and human resources support. I am curious about the kind of resources that are supplied to the officers of Parliament and the independent Crown entities and about whether they are expected to use common office space, HR support and so on.