The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 792 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Lorna Slater
Once again, I challenge the assertion that nothing has been done. Commissioning the James Hutton Institute to undertake a review of the existing evidence was the first step towards understanding where the gaps are, so that we can commission research into those gaps.
After our discussion with the round table last week, we have identified some of the places where the research is most needed and we can take that forward. I would be happy to write to the member about what came out of that round table and how we are going to move the research forward, because that is something that we are all interested in.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Lorna Slater
Absolutely. Decisions about pesticides, such as this one, are undertaken on behalf of the Scottish Government by the Health and Safety Executive, which is the delegated authority and does that based on all the necessary evidence.
The emergency application concerning Asulox was made at the UK level. The Health and Safety Executive takes evidence, makes a decision and then makes a recommendation to all four UK nations, at which point each of the four nations responds by either accepting the HSE’s recommendation or by taking other action. In this case, DEFRA took another action, which was to call in the refusal and then make a different decision.
When I got the Health and Safety Executive’s recommendation, I asked the UK Expert Committee on Pesticides to take a view on it. In addition, the Scottish Government’s chief scientific adviser took a view. As has every Scottish minister before me, I agreed to go with the HSE’s recommendation. A Scottish minister has never gone against an HSE recommendation. As to why DEFRA took a different decision, I am unfamiliar with its reasons; it has not published them.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Lorna Slater
I do not have a date for that, but I can get the member that information.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Lorna Slater
What has changed this year is the Health and Safety Executive’s recommendation. I am happy to go through the reasons for that change, which I have here.
The reasons why, after 10 years of authorising the use of Asulam, the Health and Safety Executive changed its mind this year are as follows.
First, as I have already mentioned, Asulam is considered an endocrine-disrupting chemical, which is a
“substance that alters the ... functions of the ... hormonal system, causing adverse health effects”.
Since 2020, as part of the requirements for making the emergency authorisation, the Health and Safety Executive has asked applicants to provide evidence on that, which they have failed to do. That was one reason. The Health and Safety Executive was not given sufficient evidence by the applicants, which they had been asked for.
A second reason why its use was refused this year was that a new process was being considered that had a new and relevant impurity in it. The data required to evidence the toxicological assessment of that impurity was not submitted, so it could not be assessed.
Another issue is that, in previous years, after emergency applications, Asulam, which is the main chemical, has been found in water in both Scotland and England. The spraying of the chemical in Scotland led to an incident where it exceeded the water quality standard for drinking water, which was above the level for 2022. Such evidence that it was getting into drinking water at above safe levels was another reason for the decision.
11:45The final reason was that, although the HSE recognises the importance of managing bracken for the prevention of Lyme disease and the regeneration of habitat, it points out, and I will read out its exact answer:
“however, while the benefits of controlling bracken are set out, the applicant has indicated that bracken covers 1.5 million hectares in the UK but proposes to treat only 7,500 hectares”—
that is, in the UK—
“meaning that the danger remains in 99.5% of the UK”
and in 98 per cent of Scotland.
“Therefore, the extent of the reduction in danger is unclear and may be low.”
This year, the HSE could not authorise the treating of 2 per cent of Scottish bracken with that chemical because it has ended up in the water, we do not have data that shows that it is safe when it comes to endocrine disruption, and no toxicological data has been supplied about the new impurity in it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Lorna Slater
—and from the ground.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Lorna Slater
As I have said, the paper that we have on the carcinogenic effects of bracken relates to people consuming it—eating it—which is not standard practice in Scotland, so that is not a mechanism—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Lorna Slater
I believe that we received 12 responses.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Lorna Slater
About 40.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Lorna Slater
The NatureScot report on minimum bullet weight involved an experiment to understand how the bullet impacted the animal when it was shot in different places on the body. That would address Edward Mountain’s concern.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
Lorna Slater
That would absolutely be part of it.