łÉČËżěĘÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 14 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 921 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Lorna Slater

My final question is slightly more general. I think that you have covered this, but I am going to get you to say it explicitly for the record. Do you think that the requirement for a potential property item to exist separately from the legal system is clear enough in the bill, given the on-going debate about the extent to which that is possible for digital assets?

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Lorna Slater

It is a record.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Lorna Slater

Thank you. That is very clear.

Turning to things that will be recognised as digital assets under the bill, tokenisation is an emerging use of digital technology but is not dealt with directly by the bill. Can you share your views on the concept of tokenisation and whether certain types of tokenised assets are likely to be recognised as digital assets under the bill?

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Lorna Slater

Good answer.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Digital Assets (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 26 November 2025

Lorna Slater

If current systems were to develop to allow changes in limited circumstances—for example, in cases of fraud—is it fair to deny any potential property items arising from those systems recognition under the bill?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 19 November 2025

Lorna Slater

The issue is about humans releasing and relocating animals. You need to have a licence to release a beaver, relocate a red squirrel or release a lynx or another new animal into the environment. You should need a licence to release pheasants into the environment. That is all—a licence.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 19 November 2025

Lorna Slater

I would like to hear from the cabinet secretary on that point. I am unclear why the exemption was granted in 2011. It was certainly not granted on environmental grounds, but the gamekeeping lobby won that exemption. I would like to hear from the cabinet secretary what the Scottish Government’s intentions are on pheasants.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 19 November 2025

Lorna Slater

I do not intend to move amendment 40, in favour of Mercedes Villalba’s amendment 12.

It is significant that members from three Opposition parties have lodged amendments concerning the release of pheasants. The RSPB estimates that 31.5 million pheasants are released in the UK annually. Pheasants are tropical birds but, because of explicit exemptions in the Wildlife and Natural Environment (Scotland) Act 2011, no licence is needed by anyone, anywhere, to release any number of pheasants into Scotland without any concern for the spread of disease such as avian flu, impacts on native species or the wellbeing of the birds.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 19 November 2025

Lorna Slater

That is great—I am glad that we are reducing the potential impacts of pheasants. However, that is still not an argument against licensing. Why treat that one tropical bird species differently from every other animal species on planet earth that might be released into Scotland? We should know how many pheasants there are, who is releasing them and where, and we should know the impact that they are having on our environment. We do not know those things.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 19 November 2025

Lorna Slater

If that were to be the case, I would have included other ground-nesting and game birds in the amendment, but it is about pheasants only. That is because pheasants are not native to Scotland and are not part of our natural ecosystem. If we are releasing tropical birds into Scotland, we should at least know where they are being released, who is releasing them and what impact they are having on the environment. It is suspected that they have an impact by eating the eggs of native reptiles such as the adder, which contributes to reductions in the number of those reptiles. It is also suspected that pheasants contribute to an increase in the fox population, which menace farmers around the country.

However, research has not been done to show how much impact pheasants have, because there has been silence from the gamekeeping lobby. They say, “We’ll not look at pheasants, and we’ll present that there’s no problem.” However, the 31.5 million pheasants that are being released into the UK each year—[Interruption.] Just let me finish my line.

Those 31.5 million pheasants have more biomass than all the native birds of the UK combined. There are more pheasants by mass than all the native birds in the UK. That is absurd; there is no way that they are not impacting the environment, although I accept that we need to collect data on that.