łÉČËżěĘÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 11 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 868 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Lorna Slater

So, there is no fee incurred for keeping a register up to date.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Lorna Slater

It is on the creditors and the debtors, as it were—the person who has made the pledge—to keep track of it. Is that correct?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Lorna Slater

Do we not have any concerns about the fact that a debtor’s information is publicly available in that way? In fact, if I understand correctly, that is the point of having the registers.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Lorna Slater

Uploads are checked, but if I find out that my information is in a scanned document or something else that got through the check, is there a method by which I can request that that information be corrected or redacted, given that I am not one of the two parties that can do the corrections?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Lorna Slater

We have talked a little bit about information accuracy for the creditor and the debtor. My question is about third parties. Other documents might have been uploaded as evidence for the asset that is being pledged—for example, invoices, which might include customer or individual information. On the point about customer databases being proof of the value of the asset, how does personal information get redacted from that supporting information? It is not about the creditor or the debtor, but the fact that you have all those customers is evidence of the asset. How is the privacy around that information assured, and how can that information be appropriately redacted?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 29 January 2025

Lorna Slater

Thank you.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Lorna Slater

Thank you, convener.

I note what was said earlier about sharing best practice, and I am really interested to hear specifically about the lessons that have been learned from the existing deals. Many of them are now quite mature, so the committee has been talking about what another tranche of deals would look like. Overall, it seems that quite a lot of positive has come from those deals, but if we were to do this again—if we decided that it is worth while for multiple levels of Government and industry to work together to create such deals—what would you do differently and what would be the same? Is it worth doing again? What lessons have been learned? What would we keep and what would we change for next time?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 15 January 2025

Lorna Slater

I wondered whether now is a good time for me to ask my question because it follows on from yours, convener. Is that all right?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 15 January 2025

Lorna Slater

Okay. Thank you very much. I challenge some of those points. The project was not brought forward by the grass roots—it was brought forward by Transport Scotland—and it has not been possible to reassess it because of the structure of the deal. However, I appreciate the answer.

On a more positive note, I suppose, I think that the secretary of state will acknowledge that the newer deals seem to be a bit more grass roots and focus more on innovation and sustainability. What next? Will there be a new tranche of city region deals? What should those look like?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 15 January 2025

Lorna Slater

I want to thank you very much for coming this morning, secretary of state. Your predecessor did not accept invitations to give evidence to this Parliament, and we are delighted that you have.

The committee has taken substantial evidence on the benefits of collaborative long-term working between levels of government and industry, which some of these deals have supported. Many of the projects have been grass roots-led and prioritise sustainability and innovation. However, that is not true for all the projects. In the older regional deals, there are some dinosaur road and car-based projects initiated by Transport Scotland, of which the Sheriffhall roundabout—which I know the secretary of state will be familiar with—is the one with which I am most familiar. My question is on the same theme as that pursued by Jamie Halcro Johnston. It appears that Transport Scotland could not get that project prioritised or funded through normal means, so it has turned to the deal. However, it is a bit of a dinosaur. It was proposed before any Government in the UK had declared a climate emergency and before the Scottish Government had set a target to reduce car kilometres by 20 per cent, and there is a grass-roots local campaign against it.

The project is stuck. It is demonstrably not being built, but if you ask any level of government why we cannot reprioritise the funds or change up the project, the answer is always because it is part of the region deal and down to “that Government”, with everyone pointing fingers, which means that we cannot change anything. The question is how Governments can, with democratic mandates that change over time, adjust these longer projects to align with current priorities. It just feels like hands are tied.

10:00