The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 868 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Lorna Slater
In previous evidence sessions, we heard from representatives of business and so on that they feel that they have a good understanding of the duties of business as regards reaching net zero, the wellbeing economy, the circular economy and the new kid on the block: being nature positive. However, I am not sure that that is what I have been hearing on the ground. I would love to hear from you guys how well you think Scottish businesses understand their duties in all those spaces, because that is quite a lot for them to take on.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Lorna Slater
We have been speaking about how effective parliamentary committees are in scrutinising SPCB supported bodies, but those bodies do some really useful and valuable work, and we are not entirely confident that that work is always fed in effectively to the Parliament, then used. We are looking at how to make that system more effective.
Auditor General, I understand from Richard Leonard that you come into the Parliament weekly to give an update on your work and how things are going, but other supported bodies come to the Parliament only annually, and, when they do, they discuss their annual review rather than any specific and potentially crucial work that they are doing.
How did it come to be that you report weekly whereas the other bodies do so annually? Is that because of legislation, or is it just based on a code of practice? Is your approach an effective way of feeding in? Should other bodies be doing something similar? Should that approach be mandated? I am interested in your thoughts on that.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Lorna Slater
Thank you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Lorna Slater
Thank you. The committee鈥檚 role is to look at the potential structures, as opposed to any particular commissioner鈥檚 merits, because they will be decided on by the Parliament.
We have discussed how effective committees are in scrutinising SPCB supported bodies鈥攈ow much time and bandwidth they have to spend with those bodies鈥攂ut we have mentioned that several SPCB supported bodies do excellent work on really important things that is not fed into the Parliament at all. I am not even sure that we are using the bodies that we have effectively, in either direction. Do you have any thoughts about that?
Parliamentary committees are already having trouble scrutinising the SPCB supported bodies that we have. If there were more bodies, the committees would be spread even thinner. Equally, are you concerned that SPCB supported bodies are not having their fantastic work fed back into the Parliament? Would not the creation of more commissioners just make the level of scrutiny worse and reduce effectiveness?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Lorna Slater
Do Sarah Boyack or Jeremy Balfour have any comments?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Lorna Slater
I want to clarify something. I understood from one of the committee鈥檚 evidence sessions that one of the offices gets audited twice a year, but you are saying that that is not accurate and that it is audited only once a year.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Lorna Slater
Therefore, you do not recognise the process as a layering of external audits. Do you think that the issue is about the relationship between internal and external audits?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Lorna Slater
That is fine. I wonder whether Colin Smyth wants to come in briefly on that point before I go to my next question.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Lorna Slater
Colin Smyth alluded to the idea of having a minister for X鈥攖hat is, a minister to cover whatever advocacy we might be looking for. However, everyone is of the view that such things should be independent of Government. Is there any value at all in having, say, a minister for disabled people or a minister for older people to provide that complementary function and bring that advocacy into Government?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Lorna Slater
Thank you.