The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2725 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
Yes, they do, and there has been a significant amount of overlap in the questions. My questions are on committee workload and time management. With my eye on the clock and my old convener hat on, I ask for succinct responses from the witnesses, please.
The last thing that members of the public would want is 175 成人快手, because they wonder what on earth we are doing in here anyway. Can you comment on the current approach to committee subject coverage and how we are mirroring ministerial portfolios? Are there other ways to organise committees? I suspect that we have an awful lot of ministers in this Government, given the size of the thing.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
They are not based in Westminster; they are geographically spread across the country.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
That is a nice question.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
How would you change those from a PR exercise to something much more substantial and connected?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
We did something similar with the Promise, which is a policy for care-experienced young people. We held an informal meeting with those young people, who were quite insightful.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
That is helpful. We heard your examples about people in other parts of the country. How do visits from committees and off-site evidence taking impact the culture of committees and the relationships between committees, Parliament and the public?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
That is interesting, because we have not picked up on that in the gender audit work.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
The public get fatigued by all the consultations that go on at different levels.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
We have touched on doing that with our people鈥檚 panel on drug-related deaths, which I attended.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
That is interesting. My next question is on that theme, but it is about engaging not with ministers in that manner but with external stakeholders. How can we be much more effective in leveraging our relationships with external stakeholders to drive more effective scrutiny and support the work of committees? External stakeholders who give evidence, such as you, make committees more effective and provide a supporting role. Do you have any thoughts on that?