The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2843 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
Thank you for coming along, cabinet secretary. You mentioned the cross-party support for the bill, but given that the NHS has always had the ability to refer patients for services between Scotland and England, can you see any reasons why you might not need to establish the reimbursement scheme?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
Our papers say that, when we called for views on the bill from the health boards, we received responses only from NHS Highland and NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde. That is an indicator that the health boards are perhaps not aware of what is going on despite the publicity that the matter has had. What work is under way to publicise the service to the various NHS boards throughout Scotland? What is the timeline for them to receive guidance on the referral routes to make the process as clear as possible for women who will access the service via their local health boards?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Sue Webber
From what we heard this morning before the meeting, the biggest issue appears to be women having the money up front to fund the surgery; the bill is about reimbursement. We also heard that there could be significant on-going costs that are not planned for regarding surgery for removal of mesh and complications—particularly when women access surgery through the private sector. Is there something that we can do to help with that? It will not be a very equal service if there are women who do not have the resources to pay up front then claim it back and therefore cannot access what the bill is, ultimately, trying to achieve.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Sue Webber
In one of your earlier statements, Terry, you spoke of new staff coming on board. Where are they being recruited from? What multidisciplinary areas of expertise do they cover that the team did not cover previously?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Sue Webber
Is that the realistic medicine that you referred to earlier in the discussion today?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Sue Webber
Thank you for clarifying that—it was very helpful. What is the position for women who have had mesh removal surgery that has not gone as they expected? When surgery has not been as successful as it was hoped it would be and there are on-going issues, how will that be covered or addressed by the bill?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Sue Webber
My question is also for Terry O’Kelly. We have heard a lot from witnesses about the logistical challenges in managing the private sector experience in the US and England, and the challenges facing the NHS service in gaining trust. Obviously, an NHS-based service will be much better at managing the anticipated and unplanned outcomes of the complex surgery. What is being done to benchmark and reassure people that in Scotland we will have among the best mesh removal specialist services?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2021
Sue Webber
Welcome, cabinet secretary. My question is about online advertising. You mentioned the reasons why you want to take that approach, but have you had any thoughts about what you might like to do that would be different from the approaches of the other UK nations?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Sue Webber
I apologise, convener.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Sue Webber
I want to try to bring everything together into one question and contextualise what I am asking about with something that was in the press over the weekend and which I think highlights the need to promote preventative support, collaboration and the integration of new and more innovative solutions such as the West Lothian Food Train, which I have visited.
I suppose that my question is for Derek Feeley and Judith Proctor, given that Mr Feeley’s comment that there are things that we should be doing now and Ms Proctor’s role in representing all IJBs. At the weekend, we heard about a 90-year-old woman who starved to death. It is the first time that that has happened for decades. Age Scotland called it “desperately sad”, saying that it highlighted the scale of pensioner malnutrition around Scotland, and it also mentioned “harrowing stories” from pensioners who talk about empty cupboards and problems with grocery deliveries, particularly people who are not online. While we are waiting for what we are discussing to happen, what can we do with the legislation that we have to repurpose these services and stop such things happening now? What can we do with, say, commissioning and procurement?