The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2800 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2021
Sue Webber
Cabinet secretary, you spoke a bit about the lack of transparency, and you also mentioned “silly political games”. Therefore, I wonder how you would tackle something that has come from our own auditors. Audit Scotland has called for greater transparency, particularly around Covid spending, and has said:
“The Scottish Government now needs to be more proactive in showing where and how this money was spent”.
That also relates to the underspend of £292 million in the health and sport budget. We have also heard a response to that from Scottish National Party members in Westminster and your Cabinet Secretary for Finance and the Economy that the money has been carried forward. I was a bit concerned about that transparency because, when it comes to Covid spending, we see only one line for that in the budget for last year—it is not broken down into categories at all. That carry forward is not apparent anywhere in the two tables that I am looking at. Where is that carried forward money sitting in the budget that we are looking at?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2021
Sue Webber
Thanks. I have great admiration for NHS Lothian, too.
On the capital budget, you mentioned the Baird and ANCHOR project and the Parkhead health and social care centre in Glasgow. In the past, people have levelled at me the claim that there is not enough investment in building new GP infrastructure across the country. We might get one significant general practice funded in any Government’s term of office. Will there be more detail on that in the capital investment strategy? When will that strategy be published?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2021
Sue Webber
On the ÂŁ10 billion, you have talked about refurbishing health infrastructure. Does that specifically include technology that is within hospital infrastructure? We are talking about capital, which should include theatre tables, new theatres and buying newer and better technology. I am aware of a specific experience in Glasgow where a hospital was unable to buy a new theatre table or certain pieces of equipment but it was able to lease them at ÂŁ2,000 a time. That did not make much sense to me when I looked at the number of times that it was looking to rent versus the overall spend. I am trying to gauge what might be possible. I know that the level of capital that gets down to that granular level is not always significant enough to invest in what is needed for services.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2021
Sue Webber
That was just an example.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2021
Sue Webber
Earlier, I mentioned the Audit Scotland report that said that the Scottish Government needs to be more proactive in showing where and how the money has been spent in the budget in general. I am looking for support and commitment on that in relation to the importance that we are all giving to tackling drug-related deaths. Will the Scottish Government commit to publishing regular information that shows us the granular detail of how the money is being spent?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2021
Sue Webber
It is nice to see you today, Dr Phin. I have certainly had a lot of correspondence in my inbox about the secondary breast cancer audit, which Scottish patients are not contributing to, so I found that last question from my colleague pertinent.
I would like to ask about the key lessons that the four nations have learned from the pandemic. What policy divergence has there been, what has changed from what was done in the past and are the key lessons reflected in the framework? I am thinking in the context of the research that the Scottish Election Study published last week, which said that there was a poor understanding of the Scottish Government’s FACTS messaging compared with the “Hands, face, space” messaging that came from Public Health England. Given what we have heard about collaboration and consensus, do you think that we might be a bit more aligned in the future?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Sue Webber
That is great—thanks.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Sue Webber
Cat Berry, who was one of the witnesses at last week’s meeting, suggested that the timescales for implementation of the specialist baby loss units can and should be shortened. Do you think that that is possible, Ms Todd?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Sue Webber
Is the sound better now?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Sue Webber
I suppose that the witnesses—[Inaudible.]—very upsetting—[Inaudible.]—many of us. We heard of quite varying—[Inaudible.]—in terms of how the services are set up for people who, I am sad to say, know that they are going to give birth to a stillborn baby, and for the important moment when they have to have that conversation with healthcare professionals. What improvements are being made to ensure that parents are consistently treated with compassion across the country and in every health board, and that they are not being retraumatised when they access services later on? They are a very vulnerable group of people, so I would like to know what we are doing to drill down into those issues and to help them consistently, irrespective of where they live.