The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1811 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Is your thinking about grace periods for all those situations predominantly around the Holyrood election and council elections? Are you confident that the timings that you arrive at will also work in a by-election situation? Someone could end up with a dual mandate because of a parliamentary by-election.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Absolutely. The Scottish Government is suggesting things rather than saying, “This is our view,” but are you content for a bill to, in essence, try to hypothesise on unknown unknowns in the future?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
The next natural question relates to a person’s rights and privileges during the grace period. You are unable to affect what happens in institutions outside Scotland, but what is the Scottish Government’s thinking on the rights and privileges of an MSP? Should we curtail those?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
With the exception of a law official.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Which in itself can be a difficult task.
I thank the Government for sharing information and for the evidence that we have heard today. What has come through, not only in the evidence to the Government but subjectively—a lot of people think this—is that these are full-time roles and should be fulfilled as such. It is pertinent to address the dual mandate issue. Although the minutiae are not available to some people, it is useful to keep in mind the principle that an elected role is a full-time job and needs to be treated that way.
Minister, thank you for both your evidence sessions, and thank you to those who support you. We move into private and will reconvene in public, not before 1 pm.
10:47 Meeting continued in private.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you very much. I am happy to start with the questions, but I am also happy to open up to the committee if anyone has any urgent ones.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
You anticipated my next question. Do you welcome your level of flexibility or, as an explainer, is the 10 or 5 per cent rule much easier for people to understand, even though they may not agree with it?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Good morning. I welcome everyone to the 10th meeting in 2025 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee. I have received apologies from Ruth Maguire, and I welcome Rona Mackay who is attending as her substitute. I have also received apologies from Annie Wells.
Our first item of business is a decision on whether to take in private agenda items 4 and 6, which will be discussions of the evidence that we will hear today. Are we agreed?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Under agenda item 2, the committee will continue its stage 1 consideration of the Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill. I welcome the Minister for Parliamentary Business, Jamie Hepburn, and his supporting officials, Leila Brosnan, shadow bill team leader; Ailsa Kemp, Parliament and legislation unit team leader; and Jordan McGrory, a solicitor from the legal directorate. I also welcome Graham Simpson, the member in charge of the bill. Minister, I invite you to make some opening comments.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is fine—very sensible. I am coming to the end of my questions—I hope that you will be disappointed to learn that, but I fear that you will not.
The regional rules are much more explicit than the constituency rules. They are far easier to understand, because we have to group entire constituencies into the regions. Sue Webber prompted a discussion earlier about the challenge that then comes for local authorities, where part of a local authority area is in one region and the rest of it is in another region. That adds to my previous point about one MSP representing a constituency in three different local authority areas, because we could have up to 15 other ˿ interested in an issue. From a purely administrative, common-sense point of view, that is a very big round table to bring together to discuss problems—let me put it that way.
Do you have any comments on the consequences of the choices that are made by Boundaries Scotland? The effect on local authorities is not part of your tests—you need not take account of that if you follow the four rules—but are you conscious of that effect and do you have any concerns about it?
14:00