The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1744 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Is that before the roll-out of the code of practice to those whom it would affect?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful.
The second area that I wish to examine is the reduction from ÂŁ10,000 to ÂŁ700 for overseas campaigns for devolved elections. One of the purposes that has been highlighted is to send an incredibly strong message as to interference. There have been great concerns this week about interference in elections through data breaches that have happened. Before we get into that aspect, will such a provision ever be enforceable?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Can I clarify something? When you say “officials”, do you mean Scottish Government officials or Parliament officials?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Let me do the quick-fire round then, but with the proviso that, if you would like time to consider the issues that I raise, I am more than happy for you to write to us about them. I will just mention issues that are of concern.
The first issue is overseas voters. You might have thoughts on the voter registration and identification period, because there is a difference between Scotland and the UK on that. Another issue is voter ID—that is an ever-popular issue to talk about. Other issues are dual mandates and recall. It is going to get good, this.
Given the events of this week, one issue that I would like to hear your thoughts on is the security of elections. Data protection breaches and AI have been discussed in that regard. It has been asserted that the data breach of the electoral records will not be a problem. Where does the confidence to make that statement come from?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Would you like to comment on any of the other areas, Andy O’Neill?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful. Andy, do you want to come in?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Do you have confidence that, when the decisions in principle are made by those who should make them, you could facilitate the landing of those provisions?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Automaticity would not change the Boundary Commission’s process for amending boundaries, because there would still be local engagement and feedback loops. It would just come in with the final recommendations and relate to whether they can be blocked, perhaps—as you suggested earlier—by people who have reasons for doing so, rather than as a result of the existing process. Even if automaticity existed, there would still be a level of protection if—of course, this would not happen—the Boundary Commission itself were to stray from the statutory requirements. There would still be a process for holding the commission to account for any errors that it made. It would not make you the all-powerful unquestionable decision makers in this situation.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
We come to our second panel as we take evidence on the Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill at stage 1. Dame Susan Bruce is the electoral commissioner for Scotland, Andy O’Neill is head of the Electoral Commission Scotland, and Louise Edwards is the commission’s director of regulation and digital transformation. I welcome you all to the meeting.
I think that you wish to make a few opening remarks, Dame Susan.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
My first question is about that tried-and-tested period of six months. Substantial amendments and changes are proposed in the bill. Are you confident that six months is still a sufficient period for developing an understanding, so that people who stand for election, those who support them and the people who will exercise their democratic right and vote will understand the changes?