成人快手

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 30 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2087 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

What is your party鈥檚 view on our having a week during which we would have only committee meetings and no chamber sittings? That is what happens in a number of other legislatures. Having said that, I am unable to point to any evidence, but there are a number of examples of legislatures in which the chamber sits one week and the week either side is given over to committees. That would mean that you would not have the challenge that you have set out, and it would also address the fact that members sit on more than one committee.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

I am very conscious of the time and of the fact that many people who are here have a commitment to be somewhere else in the not-too-distant future.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

I come back to Sue Webber.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

Excellent.

As always, minister, if anything comes to mind for either members or yourself, we know how to reach out to each other. I thank you and your officials for your time this morning.

Meeting closed at 11:33.  

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

I am sorry, Karen, but can you just clarify something? Do you mean that they are elected, because they are 成人快手 who have come into the Parliament or because they are technically elected by the committee? Are you talking about their route into this Parliament?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

I suppose that the purpose of my question is to find out whether that individual needs support, in primary legislation, to make those decisions. In some areas, one could see there being conflicting views on such decisions. Perhaps having very open, strong guidance鈥攅ven just on a minimum number of sites鈥攚ould reinforce and support those decisions without opening the petition officer up to criticism.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

From an administrative point of view, the mechanics suggest limiting it, but鈥擨 do not want to use the word 鈥渁utomation鈥濃攅lectronification of electoral registration may make it easier. Would it be reviewed at that stage?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

Those provisions should apply to the petition process, the subsequent regional poll and/or a by-election. That is probably easier with regard to constituency by-elections, but the point should be made specifically in relation to regional polls and behaviour during the petition period.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

Under the proposal in the bill, the question in the petition is, in essence, a finite one and, when the 10 per cent threshold is reached, there will be a recall. Should we simply rely on that finite question and, when it is answered, say, 鈥淭here will be a recall,鈥 or have you seen from previous examples any value in a petition staying open, given the constraint that people can say only, 鈥淵es鈥?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 May 2025

Martin Whitfield

The reality is that, with the deep hope that the situation will happen infrequently, the exercise has to start every time that the situation occurs.

I want to go back to the challenges with regard to registration. A lot of the evidence that has been submitted relates to the challenges that occur if another local by-election is being held at the council level. Do we need to bring together the systems in respect of whether a person is or is not on that register, to take account of that challenge? I accept that that situation is administratively challenging, but is it one that, if the right level of clarification were to be given about the cut-off dates, could be made to work administratively?