The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2084 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
So, the public can be confident that not starting the time until some future date is because the level that is needed to prove a potential offence is so high that it will be used only when something has been put beyond the reach of the public deliberately, with the intent of preventing the public from seeing it. The public can take confidence in having a more elongated timescale, if I can put it that way.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Good. My final question is about the 12 months until royal assent, should the bill be passed. Do you have any views about the code of practice on proactive publication in that time?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Therefore, the Scottish Government鈥檚 concern is not that the Parliament is an unusual vehicle but that the Scottish Government鈥檚 wider interest in FOI鈥攜ou have talked about cross-policy input鈥攊s so great that designation should not sit with the Parliament. Should the process stay in place, so that the Parliament is involved only in iterations of updating?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Sue, can I bring you in?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
No problem鈥攖hat is excellent. I call Rona Mackay.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Yes.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
So, it is not a cultural stance that proactive publication is wrong, and the reality of understanding what is鈥攁nd possibly more important, what is not鈥攃overed by the term may move the Government鈥檚 stance.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Can I clarify that? It is not the only protection that would prevent disclosure of information. In effect, the First Minister鈥檚 veto is the last of a number of walls that have to be gone through or over鈥攈owever we want to describe it. It is the last step of the Scottish Government, which is represented, along with the law officers, by the First Minister taking the decision, and my understanding is that reference then needs to be made to previous barriers that could have prevented the publication. The power has never been used, and it is an outlier on the international stage.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
You are confident that the definition of freedom of information that we have had over the past 20 years is sufficiently robust and is at such a level that we can still rely on our top-level understanding of what we mean by it. What will change is the technology that gives access to it. Would it be fair to say that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Interestingly, the Government鈥檚 proposal was to make such lobbying of parliamentary interest under the 2016 act.