The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2087 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Are you saying that the strength of that review is the idea that the purposeful destruction of records in any situation should, at the very least, merit questions as to why it occurred?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Ben Worthy, shall we start with you?
I am allowing others some thinking time.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is fine.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
Our second item of business is consideration of a document that is subject to the negative procedure and that has been referred to this committee for scrutiny on policy grounds.
Questions about the actual rules on imprint would need to be decided on by the Electoral Commission, and the role of this committee is in relation to either accepting or not accepting the guidance.
For clarity on procedure, any MSP may propose, by motion, that the lead committee recommend that the document not be approved. We are the lead committee for this document. If such a motion is lodged, it must be debated at a meeting of the committee, and the committee must then report to the Parliament. If there is no motion recommending that the document not be approved, the committee is not required to report to Parliament on the document.
I invite comments from members on the guidance that is before us.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you for that. A member has indicated that she will propose a motion, which we will need to debate. That debate cannot happen today, because the motion has not been lodged, but it will take place at the next public meeting of the committee.
Since no other member wishes to make a comment at this stage, I will adjourn the matter until the next public meeting of this committee, when we will see whether a member has lodged a motion.
That concludes our business in public.
09:35 Meeting continued in private until 09:45.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
Good morning, and apologies for the slight delay to the start of the 19th meeting in 2025 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee. I have received apologies from Sue Webber, and I welcome Edward Mountain, who is attending as her substitute.
Under agenda item 1, does the committee agree to take in private item 3, which is consideration of a note from the clerks on cross-party groups?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
For clarification, minister, with regard to the proposals before the committee in these three SSIs, two have a remuneration deduction that relates to the MSP salary. Can you confirm that discussions have taken place with the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body about the consequences of the SSIs? Ailsa McKeever, I think that you suggested that that is the case, but I would like it on the record, because if we have an unresolved problem in one area that you are asking others to act on, that might raise a concern about the SSIs that are being presented to the committee as a formula for arriving at what was carried through unanimously in the legislation. Therefore, is it the case that there have been discussions with the SPCB and that the practical provisions in relation to how any deductions take place would fall to it?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
I have a couple of questions relating to our fellow committee, the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee, and its responses鈥攁nd, indeed, the committee notice that was given in the chamber about, at a higher, generic level, the quality of some of the drafting that is coming out of the Scottish Government at the moment.
Ironically, the matters before us today go back to pay鈥攊t is funny how money is so important鈥攁nd the tension that exists between the Scotland Act 1998 and the chosen wording in the SSIs. Minister, before I delve into what level of confidence you have that the SSIs comply with the 1998 act, can you explain why we ended up in a position whereby different terminology was used, which certainly caused tension for the DPLR Committee?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
I am not asking for the publication of legal evidence鈥攚hich politicians seem to ask for at the drop of a hat鈥攂ut is your position supported by legal advice?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Martin Whitfield
I would say鈥攖ongue in cheek鈥攖hat it is because there has been a lack of clarification that the question arose in the first place. You have put it on record that the Government is confident that the provision will stand the test, perhaps even a judicial test, and that you have advice that supports that view.
Does any other committee member have any other questions before I turn to a colleague who is joining us today?
Just for the record, I note that the 14-day period in respect of being a member of the House of Lords is a period of time that has been chosen, in essence, so that someone in such a position can resign. Is the Scottish Government confident that there are no circumstances that may exist where it would be impossible for an individual to resign within 14 days, for example if the House of Lords is not sitting between a general election and the King鈥檚 speech?