The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1811 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is very helpful. I am grateful, minister. Do other committee members have any questions?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is very helpful. Do any of my colleagues have any questions?
As there are no comments, we move to agenda item 4, which is a debate on the motion.
Motion moved,
That the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee recommends that the Scottish Parliament (Constituencies and Regions) Order 2025 [draft] be approved.—[Jamie Hepburn]
Motion agreed to.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
The committee will have to report on the outcomes of both of our decisions today in due course. Are members content that we will produce one report on both instruments, and are they content to delegate to me authority to approve the draft report?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
The next item is consideration of a request from the cross-party group on deafness to change its purpose. Members will see from the clerk’s note that the convener of the CPG has explained that the group has worked to support people who are deaf and deafblind and that the group now wishes to amend its purpose
“to reflect our work more accurately and respect the preferred language of all our members.â€
Do members have any comments or questions on this?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Our next agenda item is the Scottish Parliament (Constituencies and Regions) Order 2025. Minister, would you like to make a short opening statement on the instrument?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you very much. I have a couple of questions and reflections, which you have already hinted at. Our sister committee—the DPLRC—identified some errors in the original draft order. As you said, they affected less than 1 per cent of the list and were rectified.
In your opening statement, you talked about the outreach to ensure that the updated list is as accurate as possible. Could any steps be taken to improve that? It seems to require others to come and feed in to that list, albeit that they are invited to do so. Do you have confidence in the oversight that your part of Government holds with regard to the creation of that list?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Are you still confident that the specificity in this order is the right approach, rather than the more general one, which potentially leaves it open for an individual to question whether they are covered?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is fine. I am more than happy that the publication of the order puts those entries sufficiently on the public record—it saves your having to go through the whole list.
I have a final question. What test is applied in relation to why disqualification will take place? You hinted at the matter when you mentioned the new body, in which a position would clearly be seen as a conflict. This is not a test, but can you articulate the test that is applied to decide whether a position should fit into the disqualification order?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Elections obviously have tight rules on campaign expenditure: who does it, how it is done and how it is reported. When the minister gave evidence about the recall petition, he made the point that an individual could face an unknown campaign to remove them. Would that need to be addressed in secondary legislation? Would you expect the financing in relation to the petition to be dealt with in secondary legislation, and should it be dealt with by secondary legislation for the purposes of the recall petition?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Let me delve into that. You talked about serious offences; there might be other offences that a group of the community would perhaps despair at. For example, the provision would be triggered if someone were in prison for more than six months for contempt of court, but people might dispute the reason for the sentencing. I am not inviting you to comment on that unless you wish to. Are you content that the trigger should be the six-month imprisonment sentence rather than the reason for which the six-month imprisonment—or, indeed, more but less than 12 months and one day—has come about?