The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2087 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I am grateful for that. I now suspend the meeting to allow a changeover of witnesses.
09:06 Meeting suspended.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Our next agenda item is an evidence-taking session on the Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill at stage 1, for which we are joined by Katy Clark MSP, who introduced the bill. Good morning, Katy.
I welcome to the meeting our first panel of witnesses: Dr Ben Worthy, reader in politics and public policy at Birkbeck College, who joins us online; Dr Erin Ferguson, who is a lecturer in law at the University of Aberdeen; and Professor Kevin Dunion. Good morning to you all.
We will move directly to questions. Members might want to put their questions either to the whole panel or to individuals. Should any of you wish to respond—there is no necessity for you to do so—please indicate that that is the case. Ben, if you raise your hand or use the hand function on your computer, I will bring you in at the appropriate time.
The wonderment of being convener is that I get to ask the first question. My first set of questions is really for all of you; it is partly to set the scene and to enable you to indicate the area in which you will be contributing.
We have conducted a consultation on the matter at hand, and respondents across the sector have indicated that Scotland’s freedom of information legislation is both widely used and well regarded. How would you, as individuals, assess the current state of the freedom of information regime here in Scotland? Ben, can I come to you first on that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That was helpful.
Ben, I was going to ask you the same question, but you also mentioned the international reputation that Scotland’s freedom of information legislation has. It has been suggested that, although it is still well regarded, it is not as good as it should be. As well as responding to my previous question, can you say whether the bill will move us forward with regard to our international reputation of being—I hope—at the forefront of making clear the importance of freedom of information?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Excellent. Thank you, Ben. Erin, can I come to you?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you. Kevin, is there anything that you would like to add?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
The result of the division is: For 0, Against 3, Abstentions 2.
Motion disagreed to.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
We move to consideration of a draft order and a Scottish statutory instrument, both of which relate to arrangements for the signature request requirements for proxy and postal votes for the forthcoming Scottish Parliament elections. The draft order is subject to the affirmative procedure and the statutory instrument is subject to the negative procedure.
The committee has an opportunity to take evidence from the Minister for Parliamentary Business and Veterans before we consider whether to recommend to the Parliament that the instruments be approved or whether we wish to make any recommendations. I welcome the minister, Graeme Dey. He is joined by Scottish Government officials: Iain Hockenhull, the head of the elections team; and Lorraine Walkinshaw, from the legal directorate. Minister, would you like to make a short opening statement before we turn to questions from members?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I am grateful for that opening statement. Do members have any questions?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Kevin Dunion, I want to come back to your response about the role of the Parliament. The bill proposes a role for the Parliament in actively participating, and I think that your answer suggested that, although possible, it might be more desirable for the Parliament to more actively oversee decisions that are made by ministers. Is that right?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That was helpful.