成人快手

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 13 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1811 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

We will now have a short suspension.

10:33 Meeting suspended.  

10:37&苍产蝉辫;翱苍&苍产蝉辫;谤别蝉耻尘颈苍驳鈥&苍产蝉辫;&苍产蝉辫;

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

The final group that we will consider today is a proposed CPG on culture and communities. I welcome Sarah Boyack MSP, who joins us as the convener of the proposed group. I invite Sarah to make some opening comments.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

That is helpful.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

That is kind. Thank you very much indeed, Sarah.

Agenda item 8 is on the approval of cross-party groups. It is for the committee to consider whether to accord recognition to the proposed cross-party groups that we have heard from today鈥攖hat is, the proposed cross-party group on Ireland, the proposed cross-party group on long Covid, the proposed cross-party group on outdoor education, the proposed cross-party group on women, families and justice, and the proposed cross-party group on culture and communities.

Do members have any comments to make before I formally ask the committee whether to accord recognition to the proposed cross-party groups?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

Those who drafted the equality impact assessment certainly seemed to face a challenge in saying what the impact would be, given the lack of data. I think that there is agreement on that. I will push further: will the follow-up take place on the basis of the expenditure returns that come after the council elections in May next year?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

I am sorry, but I am talking about the impact of the policy on the excluded expenditure returns, because that falls under the Government鈥檚 responsibility.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

The wording in the SSI is broad. It talks about the additional costs that any disabled person would face. It is only when we look at the policy note that we see that there appear to be emphases and restrictions. I absolutely accept and whole-heartedly agree that this should be about removing the additional expenses that some individuals face in running for election, as compared with others.

The certainty of that answer brings me to my last question on this SSI, which is about the bodies that were consulted. I found the bodies that were reached out to a little limited鈥攍et me put it that way鈥攇iven that various bodies in Scotland have substantial evidential experience that could have been contributed. I hear what you say about the responses that you received, but were positive steps taken to reach out and ask disability organisations and disabled elected representatives to feed into this?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

It is fair to say that, in the previous election, events in East Lothian led to an emergency proxy being issued at about 9 o鈥檆lock, and I can see similar events occurring in council elections.

As no other committee members have any questions on the Representation of the People (Postal Voting for Local Government Elections) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2021, we will move to the Scottish Local Government Elections Amendment Order 2021.

I will use the convener鈥檚 privilege and start the questioning, because a couple of matters concern me, the first of which is the equality impact assessment. I note from the information that was provided that there was an assurance that the assessment would be published before the instrument was laid before the chamber. It has, indeed, been published alongside the instrument. I do not know whether the minister has had sight of the equality impact assessment, but some questions were raised when it was being compiled. The assessment says:

鈥淔ollow-up after the elections on how this expenditure exclusion is used may be helpful in understanding the impact of the policy.鈥

In addition, it refers to a lack of data to feed into decision making.

First, will the minister give an assurance that there will be a follow-up? Secondly, on a slightly higher level, do you have any concerns about the equality impact assessment, given the lack of data about the people to whom it applies?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

In relation to excluding certain items from the expenditure, the equality impact assessment specifically says:

鈥淔ollow-up after the elections on how this expenditure exclusion is used may be helpful in understanding the impact of the policy.鈥

I understand that the changes will obviously apply to future elections, because you do not have the data on this one. There has been a very strong request, and it seems to me that, unless there is confirmation that there will be that follow-up, the impact of the policy will be unknown.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Martin Whitfield

That assurance is very helpful.

I would like clarification of a few more points. Can you explain the thinking behind additional costs for security? I have asked a number of sitting and prospective councillors, but they did not really understand what was being referred to.