The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1811 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
Good morning, and welcome to the seventh meeting in session 6 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee.
Agenda item 1 is for the committee to decide whether it agrees to take in private item 5, which is consideration of our work programme. Are members happy to take that item in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
Thank you for those comments. We have previously discussed concerns not just about the quantity—if not the quality—of CPGs but, which is more important, about the time commitment that is required, which Edward Mountain has pointed out. For CPGs to work successfully—as, I think, Tess White managed to draw out in her questions on the proposed group that we considered previously—˿ have to be able to put the time in, but the fact is that time can very quickly run away from us. The committee will return, sooner rather than later, to discuss—as Mr Mountain has rightly alluded—not individual CPGs but the landscape in which they sit.
If there are no other comments, do members agree to accord recognition to the proposed cross-party groups on the creative economy, India, the wellbeing economy and social work?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
That ends the public part of the meeting. We now move into private session.
09:34 Meeting continued in private until 09:43.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
The hope is that that will allow you to build on the good intention of allowing access to ˿ and providing them with experience and education with regard to the important country—and, indeed, subcontinent—of India.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
That is a very open question for you, Fulton. What would success be for the CPG?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Martin Whitfield
First, I want to note the thanks that you extended at the start of your comments to the others who have helped you. There are nameless people who work very hard behind the scenes in CPGs, and we might need to find some way of giving them recognition.
Secondly, I will highlight two points that you made in your remarks, which are mentioned in reference to the purpose of the group. The CPG will allow
“a space to collaboratively address issues”
across so many fields, and it will
“seek to raise awareness of the profession and to raise its profile in a positive way”,
which I think is much needed.
I thank Mr MacGregor for attending the meeting and for his application form and submission. We will take a decision on the proposal later in the meeting, and the clerks will notify the member in due course.
We now move to agenda item 3, which is approval of cross-party groups. As I have explained, Paul McLennan, who is a member of the committee, will step outside the room and not take part in the decision on the cross-party group on which he gave evidence this morning.
The committee is asked to consider whether to accord recognition to the proposed CPGs on the creative economy, India, the wellbeing economy and social work. Do members have any comments?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
For the record, who will the deputy convener be?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
Yes—it is Sue Webber.
I will follow on from Bob Doris’s question. This is absolutely not a criticism. In fact, I welcome the way that the proposed CPG has dealt with overlap, because concerns are expressed about the total number of CPGs that exist. I welcome your comments that there is a need for two separate CPGs but that the workload of each will reduce and they will approach different people so that ˿ can witness the experience and knowledge that the different sectors bring. That is most helpful.
I thank you for attending. We will make our decision under the next agenda item and the clerks will be in touch. Thank you for your time.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
Right.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful. Discussions that I have had show that people with disabilities felt very much supported by the additional expenditure. I was homing in on a request that had been made for assurance that that will be looked at after March.