The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1811 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
As you grapple with the issue, do you want to tell us what you are inclining towards? Are you following the view from the consultation responses?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
I am content, because I know that the specifics have not yet been published. Once we see responses that extend beyond the commentary, will the committee get more insight that might help us to understand why the responses have come out in the way they have?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Absolutely. I invite you to speak about one of the most challenging elements, which is grace periods, as you have mentioned. People come with different views that depend on their experience, oversight and knowledge of the subject. Is the Scottish Government developing a view on what the appropriate grace period should be? Maybe the periods would differ, depending on who had the dual mandate.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Is it also the case that the salary is, in essence, the reward for being an MSP, whereas the rights and privileges allow 成人快手 to represent the constituents who have chosen to send them here? That level of versatility allows the Parliament to develop, while urging an individual to do the right thing.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
We resume our meeting to consider evidence on the draft Scottish Parliament (Constituencies and Regions) Order 2025. The committee is joined by Professor Ailsa Henderson, who is the chair of Boundaries Scotland, and Kirsty Mavor, who is its secretary. I welcome you both to the committee. I invite Professor Henderson to make some brief opening remarks, after which we will move to questions from the committee.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Might you consider looking at that in the post-review analysis?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
There is something in that, potentially鈥攊f, instead of
鈥渂oundaries of local government areas鈥,
it had said 鈥渨ard boundaries鈥.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
My challenge to you, then, is that, in your explanation for decisions, when people raise questions about why you did something, you tend to point at one of those specific rules rather than saying, 鈥淎ctually, it鈥檚 an amalgam of rules, and this is the consensus that we have come to.鈥
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
I was not talking about the construction of the constituencies in the regions. I meant some of the explanations that have been given to constituents of why their proposal has not been taken up. The correspondence shows you pointing at one of the four rules, rather than the explanation that you have just given.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Is it much easier to attach automaticity of boundary changes to such a rule than to what we have in Scotland鈥攁nd to justify changes?