The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1811 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Martin Whitfield
Thank you. That is helpful. Do any other committee members have any questions? I will start at the far end, with Alexander Stewart.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Martin Whitfield
Agenda item 2 is the proposed cross-party group on space. I welcome to the meeting Colin Beattie MSP, who is the proposed convener of the proposed cross-party group. I invite Colin to make an opening statement on the group鈥檚 intentions and the interest that there has been in it.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Martin Whitfield
Item 4 is correspondence that we have received from Graeme Dey MSP, in which he raises a number of concerns about parliamentary motions and how they are being used, particularly those that congratulate individuals or organisations. Do any members of the committee have any comments on that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Martin Whitfield
Thank you for attending, Mr Beattie. The committee will now consider whether to approve the application, and the clerks will inform you of our decision in due course.
Under agenda item 3, the committee will consider whether to accord recognition to the proposed cross-party group on space. Are there any comments?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Martin Whitfield
You have certainly anticipated our later agenda item. Thank you for that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Martin Whitfield
That is very helpful.
To echo Bob Doris鈥檚 remarks about asking Colin Beattie pressing questions, there is an obligation on 成人快手 to ask such questions. Sometimes, we may need to save 成人快手 from themselves. I will certainly put in my letter that, should a CPG have come to the end of what it sought to achieve, it is possible for the convener of the group to write to us so that the group can, in essence, be de-recognised and its obligations can be removed.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Martin Whitfield
That was helpful.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful, and it is right to say that a significant number of the CPGs have complied with their regulatory requirements. Indeed, there are CPGs that have not got to the stage when they would have been expected to do their annual return that have complied with all the requirements. We have already withdrawn recognition from one CPG this year for failure to meet the requirements, and that is noted in the report.
For the purposes of the annual review, would the committee be content for me, as convener, to write to all cross-party groups? I would thank those that have complied and, for those that have not complied, I would highlight where they have fallen short and the outcomes that could follow unless they rectify their regulatory failure鈥擨 was interested to hear Mr Beattie talking about regulatory requirements鈥攁nd would ask them to explain why they have been unable to comply. I know that a number of events have had to be cancelled because of chamber commitments.
If the committee is happy for me to write to the cross-party groups in those terms, I think that that would be a way to take forward the annual monitoring report, which is an excellent piece of work鈥擨 echo Bob Doris鈥檚 comments on that. I would draw the report to the attention of all CPGs so that they can see how they are doing. It is very quick for members to find an individual CPG that they are involved in to see whether it has complied with the requirements.