The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1811 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 February 2023
Martin Whitfield
Agenda item 2 is in respect of correspondence that we have received from the Conveners Group, which relates to strengthening net zero scrutiny arrangements. Do members have any comments?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 February 2023
Martin Whitfield
Do we agree to support the PO’s request for an amendment to the scheme, and to clarify the understanding with regard to the designation of a proxy, which is a valid question? Do we also agree to instruct the clerks to capture evidence for the evaluation that we, as a committee, must undertake?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 February 2023
Martin Whitfield
I see no issue with doing that. We would be seeking input from the corporate body, as an entity, in our evaluation of proxy voting.
I am aware of a number of strands of correspondence that we have with the corporate body about a number of matters. However, I see no harm in writing to it and, if you are content, Bob, I am happy to do so, just to express where this comes from and what it is about and to ask for its thoughts. The employment and contractual relationships between the corporate body and members of staff do not fall directly within the committee’s remit, but I will reinforce the point that, as a Parliament, we are looking for a developmental and iterative approach to employment that is as widely supportive as possible, in order for us to get our jobs done.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 February 2023
Martin Whitfield
Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the second meeting in 2023 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee.
Agenda item 1 is a decision on taking business in private. Does the committee agree to take item 4, which is consideration of an update to the guidance on committees, and item 5, which is consideration of a paper on parliamentary privilege, in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 February 2023
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful. The discussion that was had about how we capture the proxy vote ended up in what we saw, certainly in the early stages of the first proxy vote: the giving of an explanation, the name of the member and the way that the vote was cast, so that that could be captured in the Official Report.
Again, it is an iterative approach. What you said about stage 3 is, no doubt, being looked at. It is helpful to start the capture of the evidence in order to consider how proxy voting goes forward, because there was that challenge at stage 3.
I do not know the correct answer, but the strong discussions that we had—about ensuring the capture of the vote and an explanation of why a different member is casting it—go to the heart of why it was so important to bring in proxy voting.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Martin Whitfield
All of those contributions were helpful. Graeme Dey’s letter, for which I thank him, is specifically about motions that simply seek ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ’ support, rather than motions that are intended to go forward to a members’ business debate. However, I am cognisant of what members said. There seems to be an unspoken—or, rather, quietly spoken—concern among ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ, and I think that committee members agree that they want to give the matter further consideration. Are members content for a short paper to be drafted that seeks costings and information, so that we can put parameters on our inquiry? I noted the comment about seeking the wisdom of more experienced members who have been here over a number of sessions; we could ask them to give us, at the very least, their subjective opinions of changes when it comes to motions and debates. That would be helpful.
Are members content for such a paper to be prepared and then considered at a subsequent meeting?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Martin Whitfield
I am grateful.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Martin Whitfield
Agenda item 5 is consideration of the annual update on cross-party group compliance with the code of conduct. Members have received the annual monitoring report, which provides, for each cross-party group that this committee has recognised, a green, yellow, red or blue code in relation to a variety of requirements with which the group should comply. Who wants to kick off with a comment or opinion on what they have seen in the report?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Martin Whitfield
As there are no further comments, does the committee agree to accord recognition to the proposed cross-party group?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Martin Whitfield
Thank you, Colin. It is nice to see—and I mean this in the most polite of ways—the almost juvenile excitement about Skyrora signing up to the group. It speaks to an interesting time with regard to space here, in Scotland, where there is almost that childhood excitement about rockets and satellites. The reality is that a significant number of jobs already exist in the industry, as you have indicated.
Before I invite other members of the committee to contribute, can you confirm the extent of what you are covering with regard to space? I could read the quote about the final frontier if it covers everything. Your interest is in the launch site facilities and the engineering behind the production of satellites and all the supply chains into that in Scotland—is that right?