³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 17 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1811 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Correspondence (Net Zero Scrutiny)

Meeting date: 2 February 2023

Martin Whitfield

Agenda item 2 is in respect of correspondence that we have received from the Conveners Group, which relates to strengthening net zero scrutiny arrangements. Do members have any comments?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Correspondence (Proxy Voting Scheme)

Meeting date: 2 February 2023

Martin Whitfield

Do we agree to support the PO’s request for an amendment to the scheme, and to clarify the understanding with regard to the designation of a proxy, which is a valid question? Do we also agree to instruct the clerks to capture evidence for the evaluation that we, as a committee, must undertake?

Members indicated agreement.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Correspondence (Proxy Voting Scheme)

Meeting date: 2 February 2023

Martin Whitfield

I see no issue with doing that. We would be seeking input from the corporate body, as an entity, in our evaluation of proxy voting.

I am aware of a number of strands of correspondence that we have with the corporate body about a number of matters. However, I see no harm in writing to it and, if you are content, Bob, I am happy to do so, just to express where this comes from and what it is about and to ask for its thoughts. The employment and contractual relationships between the corporate body and members of staff do not fall directly within the committee’s remit, but I will reinforce the point that, as a Parliament, we are looking for a developmental and iterative approach to employment that is as widely supportive as possible, in order for us to get our jobs done.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Decision on Taking Business in Private

Meeting date: 2 February 2023

Martin Whitfield

Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the second meeting in 2023 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee.

Agenda item 1 is a decision on taking business in private. Does the committee agree to take item 4, which is consideration of an update to the guidance on committees, and item 5, which is consideration of a paper on parliamentary privilege, in private?

Members indicated agreement.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Correspondence (Proxy Voting Scheme)

Meeting date: 2 February 2023

Martin Whitfield

That is helpful. The discussion that was had about how we capture the proxy vote ended up in what we saw, certainly in the early stages of the first proxy vote: the giving of an explanation, the name of the member and the way that the vote was cast, so that that could be captured in the Official Report.

Again, it is an iterative approach. What you said about stage 3 is, no doubt, being looked at. It is helpful to start the capture of the evidence in order to consider how proxy voting goes forward, because there was that challenge at stage 3.

I do not know the correct answer, but the strong discussions that we had—about ensuring the capture of the vote and an explanation of why a different member is casting it—go to the heart of why it was so important to bring in proxy voting.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Correspondence

Meeting date: 19 January 2023

Martin Whitfield

All of those contributions were helpful. Graeme Dey’s letter, for which I thank him, is specifically about motions that simply seek ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ’ support, rather than motions that are intended to go forward to a members’ business debate. However, I am cognisant of what members said. There seems to be an unspoken—or, rather, quietly spoken—concern among ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ, and I think that committee members agree that they want to give the matter further consideration. Are members content for a short paper to be drafted that seeks costings and information, so that we can put parameters on our inquiry? I noted the comment about seeking the wisdom of more experienced members who have been here over a number of sessions; we could ask them to give us, at the very least, their subjective opinions of changes when it comes to motions and debates. That would be helpful.

Are members content for such a paper to be prepared and then considered at a subsequent meeting?

Members indicated agreement.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Correspondence

Meeting date: 19 January 2023

Martin Whitfield

I am grateful.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Group Annual Report

Meeting date: 19 January 2023

Martin Whitfield

Agenda item 5 is consideration of the annual update on cross-party group compliance with the code of conduct. Members have received the annual monitoring report, which provides, for each cross-party group that this committee has recognised, a green, yellow, red or blue code in relation to a variety of requirements with which the group should comply. Who wants to kick off with a comment or opinion on what they have seen in the report?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Group

Meeting date: 19 January 2023

Martin Whitfield

As there are no further comments, does the committee agree to accord recognition to the proposed cross-party group?

Members indicated agreement.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Group

Meeting date: 19 January 2023

Martin Whitfield

Thank you, Colin. It is nice to see—and I mean this in the most polite of ways—the almost juvenile excitement about Skyrora signing up to the group. It speaks to an interesting time with regard to space here, in Scotland, where there is almost that childhood excitement about rockets and satellites. The reality is that a significant number of jobs already exist in the industry, as you have indicated.

Before I invite other members of the committee to contribute, can you confirm the extent of what you are covering with regard to space? I could read the quote about the final frontier if it covers everything. Your interest is in the launch site facilities and the engineering behind the production of satellites and all the supply chains into that in Scotland—is that right?