The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1811 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2023
Martin Whitfield
You do not anticipate that we will return to the level of FOI requests that we had before the pandemic.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Martin Whitfield
Yes, we can come back to that.
We will move on to questions from Alexander Stewart. As we have raised the question of complaints about 成人快手, let us have a look at the report from that point of view.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Martin Whitfield
Thank you. With the usual fun and games as convener, I will go first and steal all the best questions.
Before we start, I say that the continuing honesty in the annual report about the challenges that you, as the commissioner, and your office have faced is very welcome. A number of external comments have pointed to failings in the commissioner鈥檚 office in the recent past. All the evidence that was given at the Public Audit Committee last week and the various reports on the issue contain comments to the effect that there has been great change, but there is still change to come and that it will be some time before confidence in your office鈥攁nd, indeed, in you鈥攊s rebuilt.
What do you feel about seeing those comments, as commissioner? Do they resonate with you? Do you understand them, and are you committed to continue to reach for the higher standards that you have spoken about in your report?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Martin Whitfield
Those are welcome comments. Rather than say, 鈥淚 hope that they don鈥檛 come back to haunt you,鈥 I will say that I hope that they give you and others around you the confidence to carry on and achieve that.
I want to get into some of the detail and in particular something that I know that you are aware has interested me significantly, which is the relationship with your staff when they have concerns. We have previously taken evidence, as have other committees, about the formalised whistleblowing provisions that exist. However, interestingly, in the evidence that was given to the Public Audit Committee last week鈥擨 will quote from it, as I would like your comments on it鈥擯at Kenny said:
鈥淭he routes that staff can use if they are concerned about the office holder in the future have been re-emphasised within the organisation. For example, one route that has been emphasised involves going to Audit Scotland to raise certain concerns. The accountable officer of the ethical standards commissioner can also go to the accountable officer of the corporate body, and it has been clarified that there is a reporting route to the chair of the audit advisory board if there are concerns within the organisation.鈥
He gave a little bit more evidence and then said:
鈥淚 would be keeping a very close eye on that process to ensure that it beds in and is implemented effectively, because it is key that that be put right. Progress has certainly been made in that respect, but it is very important that the audit function continues to look at that issue.鈥濃擺Official Report, Public Audit Committee, 2 March 2023; c 7.]
The issue is not just about financial audit; it is about the first green to amber warning signs that something is going wrong. Will you comment on that and, I hope, give confirmation to the committee that you agree with that evidence? Also, what are the challenges with regard to that issue going forward?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Martin Whitfield
That is very helpful. My final question is, unfortunately, an incredibly specific one but, again, it is about something that I have had an interest in for a while.
The Deloitte audit report included a list of recommendations, which now sit in the public domain. One of them was:
鈥淭he Commissioner鈥檚 Office should engage with the SPCB and Parliament to determine the reporting route for concerns about a Commissioner鈥.
The management update on that is worrying in the sense that there is no revised target date because input seems to be required from the SPCB. Given that we are looking at the annual report for last year, can you bring the committee up to date on engagement with the SPCB, particularly on that point, with regard to the structures that you have already described?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Martin Whitfield
Do you have confidence that the complainer will not misunderstand the different processes that are involved? I will turn that round. Do you have confidence that your website will show the route that will apply to the complainer, depending on who they are complaining about, and what is needed for their complaint to be registered, investigated and concluded?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Martin Whitfield
That is very helpful. I will obviously speak to Stuart McMillan, and, as a committee, we will write to him and suggest that we are anxious to hear his contribution when we look at the next stage of proxy voting.
10:56 Meeting continued in private until 11:30.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Martin Whitfield
For clarification, there are not 16 elements sitting at red on your risk register, are there?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Martin Whitfield
There are 16 elements in total.