���˿���

That is helpful.

Item 4 is correspondence that we have received from Graeme Dey MSP, in which he raises a number of concerns about parliamentary motions and how they are being used, particularly those that congratulate individuals or organisations. Do any members of the committee have any comments on that?

That is helpful.

Thank you for attending, Mr Beattie. The committee will now consider whether to approve the application, and the clerks will inform you of our decision in due course.

Under agenda item 3, the committee will consider whether to accord recognition to the proposed cross-party group on space. Are there any comments?

You have certainly anticipated our later agenda item. Thank you for that.

We move to agenda item 2 of this, the 25th meeting in 2022 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee. I welcome Stephen Kerr MSP, who is substituting for Alexander Stewart, and invite him to make a declaration of any interests that are relevant to the committee’s remit.

Thank you.

The committee has been considering a complaint about a member of the Scottish Parliament. I will read a statement that sets out the committee’s findings.

On behalf of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee, I make the following statement in relation to a complaint against Jackson Carlaw MSP.

The committee has carefully considered the report by the Commissioner on Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland on the complaint that Jackson Carlaw MSP failed to declare a registered financial interest prior to the commencement of scrutiny of public petition PE1879 by the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee on 6 October 2021.The committee is unanimous in its conclusions and decision.

The committee notes that, at the beginning of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee’s meeting on 6 October 2021, Jackson Carlaw MSP declared an interest as the convener, in the previous parliamentary session, of the cross-party group on building bridges with Israel. However, the declaration did not refer to the financial interest that was in his entry in the register of members’ interests of the £2,200 cost of an overseas visit to Israel and the Palestinian territories, which was funded by the embassy of Israel in the United Kingdom. It appears, therefore, that Jackson Carlaw MSP did not fully recognise or understand the requirement to declare a relevant financial interest in advance of proceedings relating to that matter.

The committee recognises that Jackson Carlaw MSP took and acted on advice in relation to the consideration of petition PE1879. In his representations, Jackson Carlaw MSP states that he recused himself

“entirely from consideration of the petition and from any determination”

and that he cast no vote and advised the petitioner in the usual way and in terms drafted by the committee clerks. The committee considers that that demonstrated the intent of Jackson Carlaw MSP to address any perceived conflict of interest.

The committee further notes the commissioner’s finding that the advice given to Jackson Carlaw MSP referred only to his being convener of the CPG and not to his overseas visit, and it concurs with the commissioner’s view that it is

“unlikely that he”—

Jackson Carlaw—

“intentionally withheld information about the overseas visit in an attempt to hide this information”.

However, the steps taken by Jackson Carlaw MSP did not meet the requirements of the Interests of the Members of the Scottish Parliament Act 2006 and the “Code of Conduct for Members of the Scottish Parliament” in relation to the declaration of registrable financial interests. For that reason, the committee must conclude that Jackson Carlaw MSP breached section 13(1) of the 2006 act and paragraphs 6 to 8 of section 2 of the code of conduct for ���˿���.

The committee therefore agrees with the commissioner’s findings in fact and conclusion that Jackson Carlaw’s conduct in not declaring a financial interest breached the 2006 act and the code. A finding of a breach of the 2006 act and the code of conduct is a serious matter. Acknowledging the efforts made by Jackson Carlaw MSP to act with propriety, the committee is of the view that its agreement with the commissioner on the finding of a breach is sanction enough.

The committee intends to write to all members to remind them of the requirements to declare a financial interest in any matter before taking part in any proceedings of the Parliament that relate to that matter. In addition, members will be reminded that the standards clerks can provide advice to them on any matters relating to the registration or declaration of financial interests and that they should seek that advice on any questions that arise.

Full details of the complaint and the commissioner’s investigation of it will be included in the committee’s report, which will be published later this afternoon.

Good morning. I welcome everyone to the 23rd meeting of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee in 2022.

Our first agenda item is a decision on taking business in private. Is the committee in agreement to take item 3, and any future consideration of a complaint report from the acting Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland, in private?

Members indicated agreement.

Our second item of business relates to a cross-party group. The cross-party group on the prevention and healing of adverse childhood experiences currently does not have any active MSP members or office bearers. The CPG is therefore in breach of section 6 of the code of conduct, which sets out the rules with which a CPG must comply. With that in mind, the proposal is that we withdraw recognition from the CPG. I know that we have had a paper on it.

As nobody has any comments, are members in agreement to withdraw recognition from the cross-party group on the prevention and healing of adverse childhood experiences?

Members indicated agreement.

The clerks will now write to the secretariat accordingly to let them know of that decision.