The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1811 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Here is a strange question that I do not know the answer to. When you are considering that, do you think only of the constituency MSP, or does the availability of list 成人快手鈥攅ven though they have not been identified at the point鈥攆eed into the 鈥渋nconveniences鈥 category?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
So they were separate decisions rather than what people perceived, which was that, because the South Scotland numbers were low, you needed something to go in it to get the numbers up鈥攐r, indeed, the other way around.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
I will ask my final questions. You are undertaking a lessons learned exercise, which will fill a huge amount of your time. In that exercise, will you consider how to preserve the institutional memory of the challenges that have happened? To put it politely, I think that the institutional memory from the earlier boundary changes was possibly lost. I am not saying that it was a whole new learning curve鈥攁bsolutely not, because I know that huge amounts of work went into the process. However, the question is how you capture and preserve the lessons learned so that, next time, the process runs even more smoothly and successfully, with a better understanding from the electorate of what is happening.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
The digitised boundaries that fit in鈥攁bsolutely.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Putting automaticity to one side, would you like to see anything change before the next go around this circle, particularly with regard to the Holyrood boundaries? Given that we have eight years鈥攚ho knows鈥攚hat would your wish list be?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
I thank you very much for coming in and giving evidence; we will now move into private to consider it. Thank you for sharing so fully the journey of the current boundary reviews, which I hope that we are coming to the end of.
14:12 Meeting continued in private until 14:25.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
I am grateful for those remarks, minister, and I sincerely hope that all elected individuals will echo a great deal of what you said about the importance of transparency and being held properly to account. Therefore, we will hold you to account鈥擨 hand over to Emma Roddick, who has the first set of questions.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
It would go further than that, in the sense that there would be parity up to the trigger of the event that would lead to a recall petition. Parity commences when a member takes the oath. There would be parity up to the point at which a member is shown鈥攊f proved through the process and after appeals鈥攖o be unfit to hold the office. Is the Scottish Government comfortable with that being the edge of parity and that the recall process could reflect the different ways that people come here before taking the oath?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Does the Scottish Government not having a view also extend鈥攚e are getting to the unknown unknowns鈥攖o views or opinions in our stage 1 report if we suggest changes? Is the Government in any way concerned that there might be different journeys for different 成人快手 after a recall has been triggered?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Although the Scottish Government does not have a view on that, it has raised questions about polling districts within constituencies. There is clearly concern that, under the bill, there would be a disparity between the levels that would need to be achieved in relation to recalling 成人快手. Is that a fair representation of the Government鈥檚 position?