成人快手

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 8 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1811 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

Here is a strange question that I do not know the answer to. When you are considering that, do you think only of the constituency MSP, or does the availability of list 成人快手鈥攅ven though they have not been identified at the point鈥攆eed into the 鈥渋nconveniences鈥 category?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

So they were separate decisions rather than what people perceived, which was that, because the South Scotland numbers were low, you needed something to go in it to get the numbers up鈥攐r, indeed, the other way around.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

I will ask my final questions. You are undertaking a lessons learned exercise, which will fill a huge amount of your time. In that exercise, will you consider how to preserve the institutional memory of the challenges that have happened? To put it politely, I think that the institutional memory from the earlier boundary changes was possibly lost. I am not saying that it was a whole new learning curve鈥攁bsolutely not, because I know that huge amounts of work went into the process. However, the question is how you capture and preserve the lessons learned so that, next time, the process runs even more smoothly and successfully, with a better understanding from the electorate of what is happening.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

The digitised boundaries that fit in鈥攁bsolutely.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

Putting automaticity to one side, would you like to see anything change before the next go around this circle, particularly with regard to the Holyrood boundaries? Given that we have eight years鈥攚ho knows鈥攚hat would your wish list be?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

I thank you very much for coming in and giving evidence; we will now move into private to consider it. Thank you for sharing so fully the journey of the current boundary reviews, which I hope that we are coming to the end of.

14:12 Meeting continued in private until 14:25.  

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

I am grateful for those remarks, minister, and I sincerely hope that all elected individuals will echo a great deal of what you said about the importance of transparency and being held properly to account. Therefore, we will hold you to account鈥擨 hand over to Emma Roddick, who has the first set of questions.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

It would go further than that, in the sense that there would be parity up to the trigger of the event that would lead to a recall petition. Parity commences when a member takes the oath. There would be parity up to the point at which a member is shown鈥攊f proved through the process and after appeals鈥攖o be unfit to hold the office. Is the Scottish Government comfortable with that being the edge of parity and that the recall process could reflect the different ways that people come here before taking the oath?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

Does the Scottish Government not having a view also extend鈥攚e are getting to the unknown unknowns鈥攖o views or opinions in our stage 1 report if we suggest changes? Is the Government in any way concerned that there might be different journeys for different 成人快手 after a recall has been triggered?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

Although the Scottish Government does not have a view on that, it has raised questions about polling districts within constituencies. There is clearly concern that, under the bill, there would be a disparity between the levels that would need to be achieved in relation to recalling 成人快手. Is that a fair representation of the Government鈥檚 position?