łÉČËżěĘÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 2 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1169 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 June 2025

Sharon Dowey

My amendment 58 would require the Scottish ministers to publish a one-off report within a year of section 6 coming into force on the impact of the permanent increased scale of fiscal fine penalties. That report would cover

“an assessment of the number of fixed penalties issued”,

the impact of the permanent higher sum on reoffending and on victims, and whether the permanent

“increase in the scale of fixed penalties has a positive or negative impact on the courts.”

The Scottish ministers would also be able to determine other elements to include in the report.

My amendment is intended to complement and tie in with Liam Kerr’s amendment 50 in this group, which would, as we have heard, remove the power of Scottish ministers to increase fiscal fines beyond £500 by regulation. The committee heard some concern about the impact of permanently increasing the level of fiscal fines, such as the ability of certain individuals to pay them. It is important to monitor the impact of the increased scale of fiscal fines on reoffending rates and on victims.

We support the permanent increase in fiscal fines, in line with the general support from stakeholders and recognition of inflation. However, it should be monitored to ensure that the fines are used effectively. In its written submission, the Scottish Women’s Convention noted that it holds “strong reservations” about the permanent increase. It stated that the majority of those who receive fiscal fines

“reside in the most deprived areas in Scotland”

and it believes that,

“in most cases, fines worsen an individual’s outcomes, placing many into further financial hardship.”

Adult justice services at the City of Edinburgh Council indicated support for the permanent increase in fiscal fine penalties, but acknowledged that there must be

“a realistic prospect that a fine imposed will be paid, otherwise the proposal could increase pressure on the justice system.”

In recent discussions with the Law Society and Victim Support Scotland regarding the bill, both stakeholders indicated support for my amendment to monitor the use and impact of the permanent increase.

Amendment 58 would improve our understanding of the use and impact of fiscal fines, address concerns that stakeholders have raised, ensure that we measure the impact that the increase has on reoffending and ensure that the use of those fines gives justice to victims.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Sharon Dowey

My question was whether the restitution order replaces compensation orders.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Sharon Dowey

The police, as a victim.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Substance Misuse in Prisons

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Sharon Dowey

Are remand prisoners offered the chance to go on a course?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Substance Misuse in Prisons

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Sharon Dowey

It does. In fact, on your comment on the SPS survey, I see that it recorded that 240 respondents wanted help for drug support and 201 wanted help for alcohol support, but did not receive it prior to leaving custody.

I return to your submission, Ms McFall. You wrote that help

“varies significantly depending on which establishment one is in.”

It also mentions

“being transferred to a prison where there was no recovery support available.”

Your submission goes on to note that

“Not all prisons in Scotland have specific staff allocated to supporting and embedding a recovery-oriented approach”.

Do you have any comments on that? Can you say why that is not happening?

It is such an issue that the committee has decided to do an inquiry into it. It has been brought up by the Scottish Parliament people’s panel. We already know what the issue is, so why is there such a range of services available in different prisons and why do some seem not to give any support at all?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Substance Misuse in Prisons

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Sharon Dowey

Is the barrier the resources to do it, or are some of the barriers the culture and that you cannot get a recovery cafe into all the prisons?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Sharon Dowey

So, a victim would get paid from a compensation order.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Sharon Dowey

Right—you will come back to that.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Sharon Dowey

So, would the police not get a compensation order, as the victim?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Sharon Dowey

Would the police still be entitled to a compensation order?