˿

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 17 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 452 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Carol Mochan

I thank the committee for inviting me to attend the meeting, because, as members know, I have previously spoken on the issue, and I want to ensure that people are fully aware of the extent of the situation involving people who have undergone the mesh procedure.

I echo the points that have been made by Katy Clark and the petitioners in their submissions to the committee. I support their point about the lack of data on the number of patients who are experiencing complications as a result of the use of mesh. It is concerning that we do not know whether we are capturing that data, which is important. The submissions highlighted the fact that the data that is currently being relied on is inconsistent, incomplete and often outdated. We should all take that issue very seriously. I will not repeat the point that the convener made about that, which was well made. It is clear the minister has taken the issue seriously.

Although the Scottish Health Technologies Group report is interesting, there is good reason to think that the data sets that it used are, as one of the petitioner’s submissions highlights, “narrow and incomplete”. Action could be taken to look at that.

In addition, the absence of follow-up data is worrying. We do not know whether any follow-up work is being done, although a commitment has been made that such work will be done. The full extent of mesh-related complications is also worrying. Given that complications might not be immediately apparent after surgery, could we have a system in place that would allow us to look at that?

I echo the points that Katy Clark made, and I request that the committee keeps the petition open and perhaps writes to the Government regarding a review of the current data sets, so that we can continue to support the work of the petitioners.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Carol Mochan

That was very helpful. Thank you.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Carol Mochan

Regarding the experience of the doctors involved, would the bill need to specify that? Should the medical profession have guidance on that?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Carol Mochan

I want to ask about the service model. As you will know, in our evidence-taking sessions, a lot of questions have been raised about the doctors who would be involved. Would the bill result in doctor shopping? How would we deal with large numbers of doctors conscientiously objecting? Are GPs in a position to be the doctors involved, or might a specialist service work better? Should there be an opt-in service rather than an opt-out service? What are your views on those questions?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Carol Mochan

Given your experience of looking into the issue and visiting other jurisdictions, do you think that it has been a good approach to provide for institutional objections, or would you wish to avoid that. That has happened in some other areas, although, as you know, it has been questioned both ways.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 January 2025

Carol Mochan

Cabinet secretary, I want to ask about ministerial powers. You may or may not be able to put anything on the record at this point, but I will give you an opportunity to do so. The bill contains 10 delegated powers provisions: nine regulation-making powers and one power to issue guidance. At this stage, does the Scottish Government have any comment about the scope of the regulation-making powers in the bill?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 January 2025

Carol Mochan

That is helpful. Thank you, convener.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 January 2025

Carol Mochan

That is fine. Is there anything about what will be in the bill that you can comment on, particularly about subordinate legislation?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 January 2025

Carol Mochan

You have already touched on the issue of assisted suicide, but do you have any comment on Office for National Statistics research that found that a diagnosis or first treatment for certain conditions was associated with an elevated rate of death from suicide? I know that you have touched on that, and that the evidence varies, but I am giving you another opportunity to talk about the issue. Are there any safeguards in the bill when it comes to giving people the ability to know that assisted death might be available to them? How would you respond to that?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 January 2025

Carol Mochan

Thank you.