The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1068 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Craig Hoy
Ms Gardiner, in your submission, you proposed an exemption for rural areas from the levy. The issue with exemptions is that you can point to any area of the market, such as build-to-rent properties, and ask for it to be made exempt. However, having read your submission and spoken to other stakeholders, it strikes me that the impact of the levy on the rural property market is a very real concern—and there are already issues with that market. If we were to implement a rural exemption in law, how would we go about that? How would we, for example, define a rural area? What more could be done to tie that down before we started looking at how an exemption might work?
12:45Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Craig Hoy
Can you say roughly what it is?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Craig Hoy
I accept that, but it is taxpayers’ money. You set a public pay policy of 9 per cent. What confidence do you have that the 9 per cent will be achieved over the three-year cycle?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Craig Hoy
How can you compute 7.5 per cent over two years? In the year after the election, are we looking at you potentially playing hardball with the public sector unions, which you have not done so far, and saying to them, “It is 1.5 per cent. Take it or leave it”?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Craig Hoy
You are the minister who is responsible for public sector reform and you have set ambitious targets to reduce the core civil service head count. We are two thirds of the way through the year. How have you achieved on the targets that you set yourself for this year?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Craig Hoy
Good morning. I agree with what the convener said about the difficulties when considering year-on-year and in-year positions, given the way in which the figures are presented. According to my tallying up, additional expenditure relating to pay and pensions totalled somewhere between £400 million and £500 million. Given that, as you have said, you need to balance your budget—I accept all the constraints, including those relating to ENICs—had you not been able to draw down that money or had you not received additional consequentials, where would you have found £400 million to £500 million?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Craig Hoy
Good morning. It has been put to us by some witnesses who have come before us that there is essentially, in the Scottish context, a trade-off between the time and cost of public inquiries and their quality. Given that both of your jurisdictions seem to be doing them more quickly than we do, it would be interesting to get your reflections on that observation. That is one position that has been put to us quite regularly by those who have been involved in UK public inquiries—if you make inquiries shorter, you are potentially diluting the quality of the inquiry. It would be interesting to get reflections from both of your jurisdictions. Perhaps, Professor Dahlström, you might want to come in first from a Swedish perspective.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Craig Hoy
That is helpful. You referred to the fact that someone cannot become a millionaire doing this in Sweden, but that is a concern here.
Another concern—both of you might want to address this point—is that organisations such as Police Scotland say that they face significant costs because they have to tool up and provide the manpower to engage with almost all public inquiries here. What provision is made for those third-party groups, which often form part of the state, either as Government bodies or law enforcement agencies? How are they funded, if at all, for their engagement and for the costs that are incurred in engaging with public inquiries in Australia and Sweden?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Craig Hoy
Dr Prasser, from your comments, I think that you are saying that certain Governments may have a similar problem to Governments here. It has been put to us by some witnesses that, when a political storm hits, be that post-Covid or in relation to a death in police custody, the minister wants the issue off their desk so, regardless of the best solution to address the issue, they gold-plate it by going for a public inquiry. Have you seen something similar in Australia? How do you guard against that in the social media age, when it is much easier to inflame public opinion?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Craig Hoy
Professor Dahlström, does Sweden have a similar political dynamic or are things done slightly more rationally?