łÉČËżěĘÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 23 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1068 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Craig Hoy

Ms Gardiner, in your submission, you proposed an exemption for rural areas from the levy. The issue with exemptions is that you can point to any area of the market, such as build-to-rent properties, and ask for it to be made exempt. However, having read your submission and spoken to other stakeholders, it strikes me that the impact of the levy on the rural property market is a very real concern—and there are already issues with that market. If we were to implement a rural exemption in law, how would we go about that? How would we, for example, define a rural area? What more could be done to tie that down before we started looking at how an exemption might work?

12:45  

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Craig Hoy

Can you say roughly what it is?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Craig Hoy

I accept that, but it is taxpayers’ money. You set a public pay policy of 9 per cent. What confidence do you have that the 9 per cent will be achieved over the three-year cycle?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Craig Hoy

How can you compute 7.5 per cent over two years? In the year after the election, are we looking at you potentially playing hardball with the public sector unions, which you have not done so far, and saying to them, “It is 1.5 per cent. Take it or leave it”?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Craig Hoy

You are the minister who is responsible for public sector reform and you have set ambitious targets to reduce the core civil service head count. We are two thirds of the way through the year. How have you achieved on the targets that you set yourself for this year?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Craig Hoy

Good morning. I agree with what the convener said about the difficulties when considering year-on-year and in-year positions, given the way in which the figures are presented. According to my tallying up, additional expenditure relating to pay and pensions totalled somewhere between £400 million and £500 million. Given that, as you have said, you need to balance your budget—I accept all the constraints, including those relating to ENICs—had you not been able to draw down that money or had you not received additional consequentials, where would you have found £400 million to £500 million?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Craig Hoy

Good morning. It has been put to us by some witnesses who have come before us that there is essentially, in the Scottish context, a trade-off between the time and cost of public inquiries and their quality. Given that both of your jurisdictions seem to be doing them more quickly than we do, it would be interesting to get your reflections on that observation. That is one position that has been put to us quite regularly by those who have been involved in UK public inquiries—if you make inquiries shorter, you are potentially diluting the quality of the inquiry. It would be interesting to get reflections from both of your jurisdictions. Perhaps, Professor Dahlström, you might want to come in first from a Swedish perspective.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Craig Hoy

That is helpful. You referred to the fact that someone cannot become a millionaire doing this in Sweden, but that is a concern here.

Another concern—both of you might want to address this point—is that organisations such as Police Scotland say that they face significant costs because they have to tool up and provide the manpower to engage with almost all public inquiries here. What provision is made for those third-party groups, which often form part of the state, either as Government bodies or law enforcement agencies? How are they funded, if at all, for their engagement and for the costs that are incurred in engaging with public inquiries in Australia and Sweden?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Craig Hoy

Dr Prasser, from your comments, I think that you are saying that certain Governments may have a similar problem to Governments here. It has been put to us by some witnesses that, when a political storm hits, be that post-Covid or in relation to a death in police custody, the minister wants the issue off their desk so, regardless of the best solution to address the issue, they gold-plate it by going for a public inquiry. Have you seen something similar in Australia? How do you guard against that in the social media age, when it is much easier to inflame public opinion?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Public Inquiries (Cost-effectiveness)

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Craig Hoy

Professor Dahlström, does Sweden have a similar political dynamic or are things done slightly more rationally?