The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 893 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 23 June 2022
Craig Hoy
We note that, as a result of the Covid pandemic, some degree of prioritisation has been entered into and some of the more complex benefits are due to be delivered at pace over the coming years, including the adult disability payment. Do you believe that the current timetable, which is in exhibit 1, represents a sustainable pace of change? Do you think that it makes sufficient allowance for unforeseen circumstances or for competing priorities, such as the creation of a national care service? Is the timescale credible, or do you think that we will have to perhaps build in time for further delays?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 23 June 2022
Craig Hoy
One of the benefits that were introduced despite the Covid pandemic was the child disability payment, which was rolled out nationally in November 2021, following a pilot in three local authority areas. Your report states that the pilot provided a limited opportunity to test aspects of the benefit and that data collection was still being developed during the pilot process. What were the risks of the Government launching the pilot without sufficient testing and how has that impacted data collection? Are you confident that the current data collection system are fit for purpose?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 23 June 2022
Craig Hoy
Mr McLauchlan, you referred to the data cleansing exercise that is being undertaken and that will obviously include local authorities, too. That process will be vital to ensure that we have accurate and complete data. Is it possible to tell us more about what the process entails? Are there any risks in relation to the quality or the completeness of the data that we might get from different local authorities? Is it very dependent upon those processes within individual authorities?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 23 June 2022
Craig Hoy
Paragraph 52 on page 17 of the briefing states that you plan to
“Consider further analysis of business support funding information after the Scottish Government has completed its data cleansing exercise.”
Can you tell us more about that work and its timescales? Can you tell us what you do not know at this point in time or what you are hoping to achieve through the process?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Craig Hoy
It could be implied that politics were also at play in the nationalisation of the yard. At any point, did you suggest anything different that might have meant that the amount of money and the risk that taxpayers have now been exposed to could somehow have been shared? At any point, did you say, “Maybe there is wrong on both sides here. Let us sit down and arbitrate for a different solution here”?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Craig Hoy
Okay, thank you. You met with the First Minister at Bute house where you say you raised a red flag about the project. Was that another one of the meetings where the officials were asked to leave the room?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Craig Hoy
I come back to the flagrant disregard for the public purse. Do you think that the Government had taken the decision to nationalise and was not intent on proceeding with any proposal, even though it was in the better interests of the taxpayer? Was nationalisation the only objective at that point?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Craig Hoy
Okay. The First Minister says that, all the way through, the major consideration for awarding the contract to FMEL, particularly when it hit troubled times, was the preservation of jobs. Can you say, hand on heart, to this committee that, if the contract had not been awarded to FMEL, there would still be jobs and a thriving yard there?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Craig Hoy
And the Government said what?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Craig Hoy
I was going to turn to that because it strikes me that, alongside all the technical issues here, there has been a political dynamic to rush this at various points for different reasons. You said in your submission:
“There was clearly a great pressure on the timing of the announcement that it was going to FMEL and there was a high probability the pressure was also on CMAL to rush the invitation to tender.”
Has there been a political driving force throughout this as well, do you think?