The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 893 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 23 March 2023
Craig Hoy
The national care service envisages a significant role for the private sector; potentially, some have argued, a greater role for the private sector if local authorities step back from that. The true cost of care seems to be the fundamental issue. I looked at some numbers. The national care home contract rate is £832 a week and a 25 per cent increase takes it up to about £1,040 a week. Private sector care home providers, whom the scheme is meant to incentivise to free up capacity in order to address delayed discharge, argue that that still falls short of what they perceive to be the true cost of care, given that they are contending with the cost of living crisis, higher energy bills and staffing cost pressures. Is it part of the problem that, until we identify the true cost of care and therefore properly fund care—particularly for those who are not self-funding—and remove the element of cross-subsidy, we will never get the capacity that allows us to aggressively bring down those delayed discharge figures?
09:30Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Craig Hoy
I want to get a sense of whether we are turning the corner on the backlog. Exhibit 2 on page 7 of the report provides information about the increase in complaints that were still open at year-end in 2020-21 and 2021-22. It shows an increase of 122 in the number of complaints that were still open that related to local councils and boards, and an increase of 22 in cases relating to łÉČËżěĘÖ. You just mentioned the 2022-23 figures. Those backlogs relate to 31 March 2022. What is your impression of whether the backlog is falling now?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Craig Hoy
You have talked quite extensively about staffing restrictions and budgets, but I want to reflect on paragraph 22 of the report, which states that all vacancies bar one have now been filled. However, when discussing the complaints backlog, paragraph 25 states that
“While additional recruitment will help, it will take time for this to be completed”.
Does that mean that more additional posts have been created. If so, how many, and is a recruitment exercise currently under way?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Craig Hoy
For the public, elected members and board members to have confidence in the system, we must see sustained improvements in performance. Your report states that the commissioner’s office is planning to introduce performance indicators to track complaints handling, which will be introduced by March this year. Is that work going according to plan; will the deadline of March 2023 be met?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Craig Hoy
I have a final question that, again, asks for a somewhat crystal-ball projection. What would be an acceptable level of backlog, when the commission is compared with similar institutions?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
Craig Hoy
Am I correct in assuming that the framework has not yet been used in relation to a particular investment decision?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
Craig Hoy
Good morning, Mr Marks. Will you reflect on Covid-19 support payments and the issue of fraud? In 2021-22, the Government allocated ÂŁ5.3 billion in funding to Covid response activities. The estimate that we were working with for fraud and error equated to 1 to 2 per cent of that. Are you in a position to say to the committee how much has been recovered from fraud and how much has been recovered from payments made in error during that financial year?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
Craig Hoy
Do you have a timescale yet for the recovery of the investment in Prestwick airport?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
Craig Hoy
Obviously, the Auditor General has looked at the framework and made recommendations on how it could be strengthened. What plans do you have to respond to that, particularly in relation to strengthening the link between risk tolerance and risk appetite for investment in the Scottish Government?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2023
Craig Hoy
The recovery of the investment.