The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 405 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Mercedes Villalba
I will clarify that my question was, “If not statutory targets, then what?” As you said, you have outlined your reasons why you oppose statutory targets. That is on the record. What would you like to see instead in order to drive that action forward?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Mercedes Villalba
Do we need a specific target for investment? The Scottish Government said that it believes that there is a risk of perverse outcomes, such greenwashing. I would therefore be interested to hear your views on whether a target for investment would be helpful.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Mercedes Villalba
Is there something that the Government can do with the bill to support farmers to drive forward that action? It sounds as though you are saying that it is more about making sure that what is in place is clearer.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Mercedes Villalba
Good morning, everyone. Thank you for having me back. I have two questions, if you will indulge me.
My first question is for the NFUS. We have heard this morning that the organisation believes that the focus needs to be on actions, not outcomes. I also heard that the NFUS does not want to see targets in the bill.
The committee took evidence from the Scottish Government when the bill was introduced, and it said that its view is that targets are a key way to drive action and that it already has a strategy and six-year delivery plans. Therefore, the idea is that the third part of the biodiversity framework will be the bill, with its statutory targets, and that the third element of the statutory targets, along with the strategy and the delivery plans, will be how we drive action forward.
If the NFUS disagrees with that—and it sounds like it does—what does it see as the best way to drive that action, given that we already have the strategy and the delivery plans? If not statutory targets, then what?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Mercedes Villalba
Thanks, everyone, for such a great evidence session.
In evidence given to the committee on 5 March, Lisa McCann, head of the Scottish Government’s biodiversity unit, stated that the Scottish Government takes
“the view that targets are a key way to drive action”—[Official Report, Rural Affairs and Islands Committee, 5 March 2025; c 2.]
I think that, from what we have heard today, every member of the panel will agree with that statement—I am just checking for any shaking of heads. No—I see that everyone agrees.
In the same session, Ms McCann also stated that
“There is no simple way to measure biodiversity ... There is not one apex target”.—[Official Report, Rural Affairs and Islands Committee, 5 March 2025; c 3.]
We have heard agreement from witnesses on that point, too.
We have also heard that, of the seven target topics identified by the programme advisory group, only three are being taken forward in the bill. There was a bit of discussion about the target topics at the start of today’s evidence session, and I just wanted to circle back to that on the basis that we are all in agreement on the importance of statutory targets and the need to tackle biodiversity from multiple angles.
Ms McCann explained the reasons for not taking forward two of the targets. On investment, she said that the Scottish Government believed that
“there was a risk of potentially perverse outcomes”
such as the
“risk of potential greenwashing”,—[Official Report, Rural Affairs and Islands Committee, 5 March 2025; c 5.]
which is an issue that came up earlier. She added:
“There is already quite a lot of work going on across Government to develop responsible private investment in natural capital.”—[Official Report, Rural Affairs and Islands Committee, 5 March 2025; c 6.]
Do the witnesses believe that the Scottish Government can support the protection and restoration of Scotland’s natural environment without public investment? How likely do they believe public investment in nature to be without a statutory target?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Mercedes Villalba
I intended to move on to a different area.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Mercedes Villalba
Do I have time to ask another question?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Mercedes Villalba
In her evidence to the committee, Ms McCann also stated that the Scottish Government
“had not envisaged doing any formal public consultation on the regulations for the targets”—[Official Report, Rural Affairs and Islands Committee, 5 March 2025; c 8.]
due to the technical nature of what is in the targets. Do any of you have a view on whether there is a need for public consultation on the regulations for the targets?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Mercedes Villalba
Would it be fair to say that fairness is an important principle to the university?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Mercedes Villalba
Is fairness something that the university seeks to promote and instil amongst the students who attend?