The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 418 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
How would you propose to tackle that in the bill, if I can put you on the spot?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
I move us on to sections 65 and 66, on expenses of litigation and application. Although the Law Society is supportive of the bill overall, it seems to be very concerned about the current policy that underpins section 65, which provides principles to determine how legal bills are paid for in trust cases. The Law Society thinks that section 65 will deter people from becoming trustees and might lead trustees to settle unfavourably or to abandon legal proceedings for fear of personal liability. It would be useful for the committee to hear whether you share the concerns of the Law Society or can offer the committee reassurance on that point.
A related question is whether you think that the availability of insurance helps to mitigate the risks that have been identified by the Law Society.
We can start with Ross Anderson again and work round the table. As I am attending remotely, it is not easy for anyone to catch my eye. I can leave it to the convener to bring witnesses in, if that is preferable.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
I will move us on to sections 16 and 17 of the bill, which look at trustees’ powers of investment. I think that the question will be to the whole panel; perhaps Ross Anderson could start off and we can work our way around.
The Law Society of Scotland and the academic Yvonne Evans have suggested that, in view of Scotland’s increasing emphasis on net zero goals, sections 16 and 17 could be amended to allow trusts to adopt environmentally friendly investment policies, particularly when those might underperform compared with other investments. The committee is interested to hear the panel’s views on that policy idea. If you support it in principle, do you think that the drafting of sections 16 and 17 would need to be tweaked or amended to make it clear to trustees that they have the power to make such investments, even when they might underperform compared with other investments?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
As the convener said to the previous panel, if any witness has any suggestions, thoughts or ideas that they would like the committee to follow up, we would be very grateful to receive them.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
I will move us on to sections 65 and 66, which cover expenses of litigation. The Law Society has raised concerns about the current policy underpinning section 65, which provides principles to determine how legal bills are paid for in trust cases. It says that section 65 will deter people from becoming trustees and may lead trustees to unfavourably settle or abandon legal proceedings for fear of personal liability.
Some of the witnesses might have heard our discussion about that with the previous panel of witnesses. We would be interested to hear from the witnesses who are not representing the Law Society whether they share the concerns that it has raised with us or can offer the committee any reassurance. We would also be interested to hear from all panel members whether the availability of insurance might help to mitigate the risks that the Law Society identified.
Would Laura Dunlop like to kick us off?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
I want to put you all on the spot and ask how that would work in practice. Would it require a formal separation agreement? The sound cut out slightly when Ross Anderson was speaking, but I thought that I heard him say that it would be helpful but impossible. I am interested in understanding how we might be able to make such a distinction work.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
There have been different views, which makes me question whether there should be clarification or an explicit line in the bill to say that that approach is perfectly permissible and within the powers.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
Would it be possible to allow a case-by-case approach to be taken but to still be clear in the bill that that is an option for those trustees who are interested?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
No, thank you, convener.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Mercedes Villalba
Thank you very much. I will hand back to the convener.