The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 971 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Tess White
I will鈥攖hank you.
So, you are waiting for guidance from the EHRC before the Scottish Government takes a view on switching the taps off for any funding.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Tess White
So, the Scottish Government is not funding lobby groups to give guidance on their interpretation of the law.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Tess White
Will you give us an idea of the timescale for that? Is it in the next couple of months?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Tess White
How will you make sure that all the right organisations are involved in reviewing that, particularly in the light of the Supreme Court judgment?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Tess White
Do you have any idea on the timing of that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Tess White
You are therefore confirming that the Scottish National Party Government is proactively looking at all the policies in relation to the judgment.
Minister, do you have any further detail on the forthcoming equality strategy for women and girls, which Shirley-Anne Somerville announced on 22 April? Do you have any thoughts about the organisations that will be involved in it?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Tess White
Okay鈥攖hank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Tess White
Maybe that is something that the committee could help with.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Tess White
I have heard what members have said, and I thank Paul O鈥橩ane for his words and for actually stating that we do have a solemn duty to respect the rule of law.
To go back to what Marie McNair MSP said, I respectfully disagree. We can represent the voices of our constituents, but to do so in the manner that Ms Chapman has done, and to weaponise language like that and make it a direct attack, sets a dangerous precedent that says that parliamentarians can act in one way in the committee and in the chamber but that the rules do not apply when we are in our constituency and being the voices of our constituents. I would push back and ask, is that the Scottish National Party position? I would ask the SNP to reconsider that, because it is setting a dangerous precedent.
I would like to make one point of substance, and then I will sum up. There are protections under the Equality Act 2010 for the protected characteristic of gender reassignment鈥擨 think that it is very important to say that.
Maggie Chapman, in her remarks this morning, did not engage at all with the statutory duties of an MSP, or with the premise that, as deputy convener of the committee, she has responsibilities under the 2008 act, in particular as the committee oversees civil justice matters.
I say to the convener and the committee that, this morning, we have seen absolutely not a jot of self-awareness. There is no self-reflection at all, which in itself is dangerous. This is not about freedom of expression; it is about the words that Maggie Chapman used to attack the Supreme Court. She has weaponised language and the verdict, rather than engaging with the substance of the verdict. No one is questioning her right to critique, but she has violated very important boundaries and disregarded the rule of law.
The Supreme Court was clear that trans people are protected under the Equality Act 2010, but today we have heard no apology from Maggie Chapman, and no remorse. Therefore, I urge the committee to support my motion, which says that her position on the committee remains untenable.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Tess White
Will you be requesting a meeting with the Scottish Government to progress that?