The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1648 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Amanda Millar, is that your recollection?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Given that you cannot recall specific issues being raised around gaps in your understanding or ability to assess risk, how did we get to a position where the risks that we have spent the past four hours talking about were not identified sooner? How were those forecasting issues not turned into risks?
If it is not about the people around the table not having the skills and expertise, and if it is not about not having the knowledge and the facts in front of you, what has gone wrong? We have had on-going conversations about governance restructuring in higher education forever. How can we ensure that we do not find ourselves in the same position, in which forecasts are not turned into risks and are not acted on, risks are not assessed effectively, and the mitigation actions coming from those assessments are not actually developed, never mind followed up?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Peter Fotheringham has touched on this a little bit, but I am looking at it through a risk assessment lens. Would it be usual for an organisation that, in your words, had had more than 10 years of financial difficulty to set the deficit budget that you set?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
My question is about the scale of the budget that you set, given the decade or more of financial difficulties that you had experienced.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Do you think that the consequent assessments of risk were appropriate?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful. Having the children’s commissioner’s eyes on that draft might be helpful in spotting things that could cause issues later.
My final question is on training and awareness. How have the conversations gone with bodies that have responsibility for training healthcare professionals and social work professionals? As you identified, it is crucial that there is culturally sensitive training and community-based awareness. If there is not such awareness among our professionals across a wide range of agencies, we will not necessarily be able to provide support to people who need it at the right time. How have the conversations gone with the people who train professionals to be in a position to provide support and identify or notice issues?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, minister. Thank you for your opening remarks and for your answer to the convener’s question. Given the range of issues that folk have said would inhibit or restrict implementation, I am interested in whether any of them were raised in the consultation that took place before the Domestic Abuse (Protection) (Scotland) Bill was passed. If such conversations happened before the final vote on the bill, how were the issues dealt with at the time?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful.
I have a question about part 2. Minister, you previously stated that the aim was to lay relevant secondary legislation in the summer, with it coming into force later this year—in December or over the winter. Can you update us on exactly when that will happen? What are the timescales in relation to part 2?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
I am trying to get at what we need to guard against for future legislation or even for the implementation of some of this act. Minister, I heard your commitment that you want the act to be implemented soon, but how can we be sure that we do not come across the same issues, either in relation to this legislation or in relation to other similarly complex and sensitive laws that we might wish to enact?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
It would be a shame to get all the data-sharing issues sorted out, only to realise, “Oh, we didn’t think of this.” It is good that you are thinking about that, too.