The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1775 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. There will be different views on whether the matter could be dealt with through the bill. Linked to that, given the concluding observations of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, which has twice—in 2016 and in 2023—suggested that children should have the right to withdraw from collective worship, which means RO, not RME, can you give us more detail of why you have not gone down the route of enacting those recommendations, which have been made twice in the past nine years?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Yes.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
We will come to that issue.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks, cabinet secretary. However, in coming to that middle ground, there is a risk that you do not appease anyone and that you do not make anybody happy by—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful. Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
—I accept that your position is where you are just now.
In a slightly different space—this might have an impact on the numbers and awareness of the right, which other members will speak about—there was concern about whether young people might feel othered by some of the conversations in that regard and in relation to children being able to opt back in if they have been withdrawn. We heard some quite concerning evidence from Leah Rivka about what were, quite frankly, completely inappropriate comments by staff members. Whether it is through guidance or additional training, how do you see us dealing with potential othering or concerns about othering and the inappropriate comments that are being made, whether we like it or not?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning and thank you for joining us. I thank Douglas Hutchison for clearly articulating what I think we have heard from every panel, and probably every individual witness, since we started our scrutiny of the bill, on the distinction between religious observance and religious and moral education. That has come through loud and clear. We have to deal with the bill that is in front of us, so we are talking about both aspects, but we all get the need to separate them, so I will take that as understood.
I am interested in hearing views from both of you on how things are currently working, on levels of awareness of the right to withdraw and on how schools and teachers deal with potentially awkward conversations. I come to Susan Quinn first.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful. From the point of view of young people and their families, in your experience and from speaking to other teachers, have young people been reluctant to approach a member of staff, because they do not want to be stigmatised, othered or marked out as different? Do you see othering and stigmatisation as a potential issue in how the system currently works?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
I put the same question to Douglas Hutchison. From your point of view, how is the current system working? What are some of the challenges or pitfalls?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Maggie Chapman
It might, however, be an issue if there were one individual, rather than that clear community with a strong identity. From what we heard last week, people are perhaps unwilling even to raise the issue for fear of stigmatisation or othering. However, that is not your experience.