The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1653 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
That is fine. I suppose that my question is about what the mechanisms are, if concerns are raised. I appreciate that now might not be the time to open that up.
I will move on to another question, which I know that other members also want to come in on. Is it possible for Scotland to fully comply with the access to justice requirements in the convention without legal aid reform?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
However, the point is about concerns, for example, that not enough people are aware. I accept that the SCJC is independent and has a statutory set up. However, is its remit clear enough, or broad enough, to ensure that there is that wide engagement with people?
I appreciate what the minister said about the focus and interest, in relation to the pillars of the Aarhus convention, being primarily around access to justice. However, there is also something about awareness and participation. In that respect, is the SCJC constrained by statute, or is the minister of the view that it could do what the ERCS and others say that it should be doing?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
You think that it is possible, even without the repeal of regulation 15 around the joint interest test.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
Okay—so there is scope for discussion. I suppose that my point is that you see that there is a problem with the way in which things are set up at the moment, because if there is a broader interest, one individual alone might not be able to take the case forward.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
There is also the extension of the inability in terms of access to justice at all those levels. Can you tell us about the impact on community groups and local neighbourhoods of the failures in the system and of failures to access justice in relation to health and community cohesion—the things that make us human?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
I should probably state an interest, having supported the campaign to save the park. It is an interesting example, because it is about the wider issues. The justice and legal system is a means to achieving something—in this case, access to green space in an area where people have lower life expectancy than people elsewhere in the city. There is a real issue of individual and public health.
Do the courts reflect on and understand those kinds of impacts? Community groups and organisations may be going into such things in relation to access to environmental justice, but the impacts are, in fact, about healthy living, community and those kinds of things.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
Okay. That is understood.
Mark Roberts, I have similar questions for you. How do the barriers impact community groups and people in accessing justice? How is the current non-compliance exacerbating these issues?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
If people have gone through all those processes and have still not got access to justice through the courts, the chilling effect is the main barrier. In your experience, is there a sense that people just ask themselves, “Why bother? We’ve lost at every stage. What’s the likelihood of success, given the procedural focus of court proceedings?â€
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
Thank you for being with us this morning, minister. I will now give you the opportunity to say a little bit more about some of the other areas that you know will be progressed or on which you expect to see progress in the forthcoming report.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
I appreciate that repeal might be a blunt instrument, but do you accept—I do not know whether this question is for the minister or for Denise Swanson—that there is an issue with the joint test, particularly when it comes to accessing the right to a healthy environment, although I know that we do not have that right in statute yet? If a community group seeks action but its membership does not include everybody in that community who might be affected, and if those other members of the community are able to pay the costs, regulation 15 means that there is a barrier to that community group even beginning the process of accessing justice, never mind getting an outcome from proceedings.