łÉČËżěĘÖ

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 18 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1653 contributions

|

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Scottish Parliament Gender-sensitive Audit

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Maggie Chapman

I take your point about what Women 50:50 is there to do. I know that others will ask about data in a bit more detail later.

Cat Murphy, what are the mechanisms around culture that Engender uses to engage with political parties?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Scottish Parliament Gender-sensitive Audit

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Maggie Chapman

Good afternoon, witnesses. Thank you for being with us and for your comments so far. I want to unpick a little bit of what you said and help us get a clearer picture.

You have all, in different ways, mentioned things such as codes of conduct, policies against bullying and harassment and complaints processes that different parties have. This is perhaps a cheeky question but, from your perspectives and given what you know and have heard at the meeting, do those processes work to protect and support women who are elected, are considering standing as candidates or just want non-elected positions of leadership in the party? When I say “non-elected”, I mean not elected to local government or Parliament—there will be internal elections as well.

However, do those mechanisms work? Are we able to use them to support and protect women from the everyday misogyny, microaggressions and sexism that were clearly highlighted to us by the previous panel?

Cailyn, I will start with you and work my way along the panel.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Scottish Parliament Gender-sensitive Audit

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Maggie Chapman

Convener, for full disclosure, so that colleagues know, I put it on the record that Ann McGuinness is a member of my parliamentary staff team.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Scottish Parliament Gender-sensitive Audit

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Maggie Chapman

Thanks. I will leave it there, convener.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Aarhus Convention

Meeting date: 12 November 2024

Maggie Chapman

Colin, I have a similar question for you. In your opening remarks, you reminded us that Aarhus is about much more than just a single aspect. Other than cost, what are the barriers to accessing environmental justice for community groups and others?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Aarhus Convention

Meeting date: 12 November 2024

Maggie Chapman

Thank you. I might come back to you to pick up on a couple of points.

I turn to Jamie Whittle, who has experience as the person who guides these cases through for so many. On the barriers that we have been talking about and, I suppose, the lack of awareness upstream and the lack of a process to support communities, where does the problem start with access to justice, and environmental justice in particular?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Aarhus Convention

Meeting date: 12 November 2024

Maggie Chapman

You spoke about the importance of getting things right not only at the sharp end of the court system. The convention talks about the need to improve environmental democracy. On access to justice, there are costs associated with court proceedings, but legal aid and other support mechanisms start—or should start—much earlier in the process. What have you seen eroded in those upstream processes during the last years that has entrenched non-compliance?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Aarhus Convention

Meeting date: 12 November 2024

Maggie Chapman

I have a question for Mark Roberts, which follows on from Evelyn Tweed’s question earlier. I appreciate that most of our focus this morning has been on the court end of access to justice. However, in your work in ESS, how much time and capacity do you have to consider compliance in relation to ensuring that the public have access to environmental information and to ensuring that they have the participation access rights? How do you assess those elements rather than the sharp end—the “things have now gone wrong” end—that we need to deal with?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Aarhus Convention

Meeting date: 12 November 2024

Maggie Chapman

Okay. I understand that you are waiting for that report. Would there be any value in being pre-emptive? Can you be pre-emptive? Is there a mechanism where you can say, “We can see the absence of access to rights and the absence of mechanisms for remedy, and we will step in now,” or do we have to wait for the review process?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Aarhus Convention

Meeting date: 12 November 2024

Maggie Chapman

That is helpful. Does anyone else want to come in on that point?