The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1653 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
I take your point about what Women 50:50 is there to do. I know that others will ask about data in a bit more detail later.
Cat Murphy, what are the mechanisms around culture that Engender uses to engage with political parties?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
Good afternoon, witnesses. Thank you for being with us and for your comments so far. I want to unpick a little bit of what you said and help us get a clearer picture.
You have all, in different ways, mentioned things such as codes of conduct, policies against bullying and harassment and complaints processes that different parties have. This is perhaps a cheeky question but, from your perspectives and given what you know and have heard at the meeting, do those processes work to protect and support women who are elected, are considering standing as candidates or just want non-elected positions of leadership in the party? When I say “non-elected”, I mean not elected to local government or Parliament—there will be internal elections as well.
However, do those mechanisms work? Are we able to use them to support and protect women from the everyday misogyny, microaggressions and sexism that were clearly highlighted to us by the previous panel?
Cailyn, I will start with you and work my way along the panel.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
Convener, for full disclosure, so that colleagues know, I put it on the record that Ann McGuinness is a member of my parliamentary staff team.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
Thanks. I will leave it there, convener.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
Colin, I have a similar question for you. In your opening remarks, you reminded us that Aarhus is about much more than just a single aspect. Other than cost, what are the barriers to accessing environmental justice for community groups and others?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. I might come back to you to pick up on a couple of points.
I turn to Jamie Whittle, who has experience as the person who guides these cases through for so many. On the barriers that we have been talking about and, I suppose, the lack of awareness upstream and the lack of a process to support communities, where does the problem start with access to justice, and environmental justice in particular?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
You spoke about the importance of getting things right not only at the sharp end of the court system. The convention talks about the need to improve environmental democracy. On access to justice, there are costs associated with court proceedings, but legal aid and other support mechanisms start—or should start—much earlier in the process. What have you seen eroded in those upstream processes during the last years that has entrenched non-compliance?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
I have a question for Mark Roberts, which follows on from Evelyn Tweed’s question earlier. I appreciate that most of our focus this morning has been on the court end of access to justice. However, in your work in ESS, how much time and capacity do you have to consider compliance in relation to ensuring that the public have access to environmental information and to ensuring that they have the participation access rights? How do you assess those elements rather than the sharp end—the “things have now gone wrong” end—that we need to deal with?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
Okay. I understand that you are waiting for that report. Would there be any value in being pre-emptive? Can you be pre-emptive? Is there a mechanism where you can say, “We can see the absence of access to rights and the absence of mechanisms for remedy, and we will step in now,” or do we have to wait for the review process?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful. Does anyone else want to come in on that point?