The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1653 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Maggie Chapman
I echo Paul O’Kane’s comments. In the evidence that we gathered for stage 1, we heard people’s very real concerns about the intention or otherwise to mislead people by using certain titles. As Paul O’Kane indicated, the amendments in the group satisfy those concerns and give the protections that we wanted for consumers. I therefore thank the minister for lodging them and I, too, will support them.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Maggie Chapman
I thank Tess White and Paul O’Kane for the discussion, because it is useful for us to air our views.
I ask the minister to talk specifically about the concerns that the committee raised in our stage 1 report because of the evidence that we received, which Paul O’Kane referred to, on the complexity of the matter and how the minister’s proposals in the bill will achieve what she says they will, given the complex nature of streamlining the arrangements. I do not think that we have the overall picture when we look at the amendments in the group, so it would be helpful if the minister would respond to Tess White’s questions and clarify why that complexity cannot be dealt with in the way that the amendments suggest.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, minister. With regard to amendments 40, 41 and 42, the named regulatory authorities need carry out their regulatory duty only so far as practicable. Can you say more about the general understanding of the term, “so far as practicable”, so that we have clarity on that point?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. I thought that it would be helpful to have that on the record.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning. Thank you for joining us and for your comments so far. Just so that everybody is aware, as a member of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body I am familiar with some of what has already been talked about.
I will follow on from Evelyn Tweed’s questions about the shift that you talked about from awareness raising and education to accountability. Angela, you came in a few months ago to a set but new strategic plan. Were there things that you looked at and thought that the commission still needed to do—perhaps things that it had been doing previously or things that just had not been done? In the on-going review of priorities, how do you make sure that you are capturing the stuff that you would have put in the strategic plan had you been chair when it was developed?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks for that. You talked about mandate, and there are some questions on your existing mandate and powers. The commission has previously said that there is very limited use of powers of inquiry, both in terms of whether the commission has used them and also what you could do with what is there. I do not think that you have done very much litigation work in recent times. Could you give us a sense of how the work that you have been able to do, particularly the spotlight work, relates to and opens up the possibility of our thinking more broadly around your mandate? Obviously, we want to have that discussion as part of the human rights bill, but are there things that we could push to the boundaries of what exists, to make sure that, either through litigation or through inquiry, the excellent work that you have done—such as the spotlights or the work on prisoner rights—can follow through to something meaningful and with that strand of accountability running through it?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Maggie Chapman
Jan, do you want to say something about the historical use of litigation and where it might be useful in the coming months or years?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is helpful. In some ways, there is quite a big conversation around the litigation powers, particularly if the non-overlap remains, because obviously there need to be mechanisms of communication and information-sharing with other organisations, whether they are commissions or have responsibility to check or bear duties. There is quite a complex system that we maybe have not got to grips with yet, so that is an on-going conversation.
My next question is about Scotland’s national action plan 2. I know that Scotland’s national action plan for human rights runs to 2030 and that the Scottish Government owns that. Tell us a little bit about what role that plays. You have spoken already this morning about ensuring that you are responsive and that you scan potential issues. How do your strategic priorities fit in and dovetail with SNAP 2? Where are the points of friction, if points of friction exist? I do not know who wants to take that first.
11:00Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Maggie Chapman
The opportunity for reciprocity is quite exciting—not overlapping, but using each other to the benefit of citizens in those targeted groups across Scotland. I will leave it there, thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Maggie Chapman
Can I come back in on that briefly, convener?