The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1653 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
You talk about the investigation and the lessons to be learned. “Itemising” might not be the right word, but it would be helpful if that process could include a very clear explanation of how recommendations provided in previous experiences of restructuring were implemented and taken forward. There may be good reasons why some recommendations were not taken forward.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Staff and students have been watching these proceedings live, and several of us will have got different emails over the course of the morning. I have just received one that I want to quote from. It says that
“as of next week”—
that is, the week beginning 24 March—
“staff members will find out if they will still have a job. yet there is no”
voluntary severance
“scheme and today they are saying that they will come up with another recovery plan in the next 2 weeks. it’s conflicting information”.
Can you confirm today that there will be no announcement of staff redundancies, voluntary or otherwise, next week?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Okay. There are a couple of specific areas where inconsistencies have been highlighted to us. For example, we heard from BEMIS on the characteristic of race; although it covers colour, nationality and ethnic or national origin, the focus, usually, is on colour, not on ethnic origin or anything else. Has that example come up in your conversations with duty bearers? Has there been a recognition that the characteristic of race, for example, embodies much more than just that one part? After all, if that is true for the characteristic of race, it is probably true for other characteristics, too.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks. I will leave it there for now.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
It is helpful to draw out those broader examples that might not sit within PSED reporting. Perhaps that is also something for us to think about—how we talk about the fostering good relations element of PSED.
There are some challenges, and we heard from the EHRC this morning that the police, for instance, have a key role in supporting the fostering of good relations in different ways. Do those issues form part of your conversations with agencies such as the police? What is the Scottish Government’s role in furthering this need—the requirement to foster good relations—especially with an organisation such as the police that has been identified as being institutionally racist? How can we expect different communities to trust that type of organisation to foster good relations? How do we unpick that knotty issue? I realise that that is a small question with big consequences and implications.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
If there are particular groups that are having difficulties realising their equalities rights and human rights, is PSED the right tool to ensure that we, as the public sector generally, take those responsibilities and duties seriously, instead of saying, “Yeah, it’s difficult, so we’re just not going to bother.”? That is not done out of malice, but we quite often hear from people with lived experience of discrimination and from organisations that support different communities that some public authorities think, “It’s too hard, so we’re just not going to touch it.”
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Do you hear questions being asked about that? Are the Scottish Government or other public agencies starting to think about it as we move towards reforming the PSED? Are people more alive to it and trying to get to grips with what it means? You are right that there is nervousness or reticence because they do not know what the duty is, what it looks like or what it means practically in day-to-day operations. Are those conversations happening in relation to reform?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is really helpful, but quite a lot of questions arise from your comments, Bill. From what you have said, the inference might be that fostering good relations is something that happens, maybe not on a widespread basis but in a much more integrated way, south of the border. I am not sure that I see evidence of that. I am interested in your perspective, given that across the EHRC, you will share information, knowledge and practice around that. In England, is better attention paid to fostering good relations, given that there is a relationship that directly feeds into the human rights sphere there?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Others want to come in on the subject, too, so I will leave it there.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Maggie Chapman
Another interesting issue came up in evidence last week. You talked about the action plan for Gypsy and Traveller communities. On the issue of racism, there was an expectation that health boards would put together and draw up anti-racism action plans. Is it your intention that all public bodies with responsibilities under the PSED should have an anti-racist action plan? If so, do you see that just being done in a phased way rather than requiring everybody to do it all at once? Can we speed things up a little bit?