The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1653 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
I welcome the pilot, but I have a couple of questions about it. The first is on timescales. First, when do you hope that the pilot could be under way? Secondly, before Katy Clark’s intervention, you mentioned the importance of advocacy; however, in this context, we are talking not about advocacy but about advice. It is important that we retain the distinction between advocacy and advice, because they are two distinct and important services.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
You said that a service already exists. I am familiar with an advocacy service that exists at the moment, but the problem is that it is not national—not all survivors have access to it. On the point about whether it is a matter for a budget discussion rather than something to be put into legislation, part of the problem is that, because of budgetary constraints, some complainers never get support. Putting the provision on a statutory footing would make it much more likely that more survivors would get the advocacy support that they need. How does the cabinet secretary answer the recommendation of Lady Dorrian, given that what currently exists is not sufficient?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
Can you give a little bit of an explanation about your rationale for limiting the amendment only to rape? Do you not think that there would be value in including other sexual offences?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
Will the cabinet secretary give way?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
Oonagh, you talked earlier about the failure to include that in conversation. I am thinking about how we solve this knotty problem. Maybe we do overcomplicate things. I also think that, if we want to get to over there, we probably should not be starting from here. Is there something fundamentally wrong with the structures that we have in Government, in local authorities, and in the relationships between national and local government and governance, even before we start bringing in integration joint boards?
Are there structural barriers here that, with the best will in the world—I think that you have all acknowledged that there is will here—are preventing us from tackling the problem?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thanks. Oonagh, you wanted to come in.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is really helpful and powerful.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning to the witnesses and thank you for joining us. I echo the apology that Jan Savage gave at the start—none of us wants to be in this situation, and it is right that we acknowledge that the people who are most directly affected should not be in such a situation.
To follow on from the responses to Paul O’Kane’s questions, there was that case last year that made it clear that detention that was based on learning disability alone was not lawful. Obviously, that was without the legal mechanisms. Cathy Asante, you said that no such case has been brought into domestic law along the same lines. Are you aware of conversations between ministers and local authorities or local authorities and care providers about the legal risk that Paul O’Kane spoke about? It should not take the threat of legal action to change the situation.
It seems as though there is something lacking in the care or support that would enable people to become de-institutionalised: we know that what is happening is technically legal, but it should not be, and we know that we should be able to provide the support in communities. Is it a question of resourcing or the lack of availability of care workers, or is it due to something more fundamental than that?
11:00Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is really helpful. In some ways, that leads me nicely on to my next couple of questions, which are also about some of the key findings of your report.
Your report said that you
“found little meaningful engagement with human rights standards.â€
Do people know that those standards are in place? Is it a question of awareness and understanding, or is that awareness and understanding there and what we are lacking is oversight? Or is it, as you suggested in answer to another question, all of the above? We sitting around this table might think that we have an understanding of those human rights standards, but are you convinced that there is awareness and understanding among the people who are out there providing the support and the institutionalisation, before we even get to oversight?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft] [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Maggie Chapman
That was helpful. Jan, you said that there has not been more focus on that issue—deadlines come and go, et cetera—and there is a lack of outrage about it. Is there underlying cultural prejudice in society and all of the institutions that are supposed to support the transition away from institutionalisation? Are people with learning disabilities not taken seriously or considered to be of as much importance as they should be?