The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1571 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. Alana, do you want to come back in?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Does Lucy Clark want to say anything about the second plan?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Those specific points are helpful, as we will have to make recommendations to the Government after this inquiry.
I am curious about your response to a question that is similar to one that I asked Jemina Napier. Your focus, clearly, is on education and the full suite of concerns around that. What else needs to work for your strategic priorities through the plan to be realised?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
That was helpful鈥攖hank you. This is my final question. Off the back of some of the discussions that we had with the previous panel, there is a sense that having a second version of the national advisory group鈥擭AG mark 2鈥攚ould help to drive forward the national plan. That might help with the development of some of the issues that you have highlighted should be implemented now rather than waiting until the third plan. I wondered whether any of you had any views on that as a way of driving development of the national plan. Jemina Napier, do you want to come in first?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. Rachel O鈥橬eill, do you want to come in?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
My final question for you, Avril, is about the NAG. Would it be feasible for that to help to support the second plan as it goes through? Could we establish NAG part 2 now and have it make robust and important interventions to the second plan?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Does the second plan even attempt to address those things or is it largely silent on them?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Good morning, and thank you for joining us. We have started talking about the national BSL plans, and I am interested in people鈥檚 views on the second plan. We know that it recognises key issues for many BSL users, but there are concerns that it lacks focus and does not have measurable goals or timescales. You have already alluded to some of that in your opening comments, but there is also a criticism that it was watered down compared to the draft that people saw initially. Lucy Clark, what are your views of the second national plan?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
Thank you. I know that Avril Hepner wants to come back in.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Maggie Chapman
That is really helpful鈥攖hank you. Following on from that, are there things in the plan that need to be prioritised and should happen first? I know that, broadly speaking, certain things will happen in the first year or the second year and so on. However, being strategic, and in the mapping or analysis of what is missing, are there things that need to be prioritised?