The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1653 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Maggie Chapman
Thanks, Ruth. That is very clear. The response does not seem to be mobilising in the same way as it did around Covid for any of the next few months, which I find quite concerning.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Maggie Chapman
Good morning. Thank you for what you have said so far. You have covered an awful lot. I am very aware that what we are trying to unpick here is decades of structural and systemic inequalities in all our structures. You have mentioned procurement. Even in the way in which we think about the economy as a whole, there are clearly very deeply embedded inequalities. As Michelle Thomson said, and as our witnesses have both referred to, it is blind to expect the same old, same old to deliver change by just throwing money at it—I think that “blind” was one of the words that Carolyn Currie used.
Given the context in which we are now, facing a cost of living crisis and a cost of doing business crisis, if we look at how we were able to respond—and the benefits and problems that came with that—to the Covid crisis a few years ago, we see the cultural shift that you have referred to in how we have revalued some women’s work and some of the priorities that we give that.
Carolyn Currie talked about things such as the digital portal working well, but during Covid there was a very clear increase in violence against women and economic abuse and control. What lessons can we learn from the policy and cultural responses to Covid to inform our decision making now? What are the consequences for and potential impacts on women in the workplace and women-owned businesses if we get it wrong? We are talking specifically about this immediate budget, but I am also thinking of the longer-term economic strategies that Claire Baker has mentioned.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Maggie Chapman
I will leave it there.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Maggie Chapman
Given what you say, which is a welcome clarification, it will be possible to identify the types of behaviour that are connected with the use of a cell as a place of safety. Will it be possible to identify the types of behaviour that are associated with other places of safety?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Maggie Chapman
Thank you, minister, for providing the information that you have provided so far.
I ask for clarity on the types of information that will be reported. Will we be able to connect them? For instance, when a child is being violent or is likely to cause violence to somebody else, then and only then can they be kept in a police cell and there is provision to report that. If their violence is directed at themselves only, will we be able to connect the nature of the behaviour with where they are kept if it is not a police cell?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Maggie Chapman
Okay. My question was about connecting the numbers with the different locations.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Maggie Chapman
—I am trying to think.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Maggie Chapman
Of course; that is where I was going with the question.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2022
Maggie Chapman
Thank you for your opening comments and your answers so far to Colin Smyth’s questions.
I want to pick up on staffing and seek a little bit of clarity. I understand what you say about the assumptions, and that there are a lot of unknowns in your current processes and thinking. In the corporate plan you have “Now,” “Next” and “Future” plans for staff. Is it the case that the “Future” plan—which mentions registrations, new services, digital, data and corporate services—will become a reality only once you have dealt with the backlog, so the “Next” plan is the transitional phase?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2022
Maggie Chapman
I would like to unpick, to understand a little bit. You talked in your answers to Colin Smyth about automation and the need, therefore, to shift skills into digital. What is the difference between the staffing that you will need in digital services—I assume that that will support automated registration—and in the new services that you have outlined?