The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1757 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Hopefully I will be quick, convener.
I do not want to flog a dead horse, but I want to ask about the student loans situation. I am a new member, so this is all new to me, but have we seen this level of impairment in previous years or is it unique to this year?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
But we have seen this level of impairment in Scotland before.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Will that resource still be available in the years to come?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Just another couple of things—sorry, convener, I know that time is an issue.
Can you give us a bit more information on the £24 million reduction due to underspends in the young persons guarantee?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
To go back to the convener’s original question about where the extra money would come from, there is a significant saving to the Scottish Government from not having to pay those fees. Instead, it could increase the rate of the teaching grant per student to make up some of the shortfall without it having to cost the Government any more, because it does not have to pay for EU students.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
I guess that there is a little flexibility because the numbers of EU students have reduced.
David Melhuish, I want to talk to you about one of my favourite topics in this committee: non-domestic rates. As you indicated in your submission, I also find it hard to believe that, in just four years, NDR will go up by 25 per cent. There will be a new tone date in one month’s time and revaluation will be a year after that. For NDR to rise by that amount, there are only a few options: either the NDR base, revaluation or the poundage rate will have to increase significantly. Where do you or your members think that the money will come from to pay for that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
A lot of businesses in the north-east are pinning their hopes on revaluation. It has been quite frustrating that that has been delayed for a couple of years.
Another aspect that you point to in your submission is the empty property relief. In the north-east, I have seen plenty of good commercial property being bulldozed to save on NDR. Would devolving that power to local authorities make things better or worse?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
I guess that the risk would be too high for people to build speculative developments without knowing that they would have a guaranteed rental at the end.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Do you feel that it might be possible to demonstrate the effects of that approach to health spend, for example? I hate to use the term “ring fencing”, because we want to get away from that. Nonetheless, could you invest in health at the local government level and keep that investment separate so that it can be identified, in order that the Government can then track that through and see what the savings might be later on?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
I go back to what the convener said about paying for somebody’s operation. Surely the best thing is for that person not to need the operation in the first place, and to invest in leisure facilities at the local government level so that people are healthier and there is less of an impact on the health service later. I know that it is difficult, but if there was a way of trying to demonstrate that, it would be easier for the Government to move some of that spend to a more preventative approach at the local government level. Anything that you could do on that would be really worth while.