The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1758 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Douglas Lumsden
I have a question about the recording of ministerial decisions. This is perhaps a question for you, Alex, given your experience. Is there a robust process or system in place so that when ministers approve something, a record of that decision is kept and could perhaps be looked at later to check who approved a certain thing?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Douglas Lumsden
To give the Government credit, it might say that it is working with organisations such as Skills Development Scotland, which should be doing that. Would you agree with that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Douglas Lumsden
I am trying to think how we would fit that into a report. Paul Sheerin, did you want to come in?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Douglas Lumsden
If we had the leader of Scotland plc in today, what advice would you give him? He would probably say that he would have to defund something else.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Douglas Lumsden
Is the issue a lack of people or of skills?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Douglas Lumsden
That is something that we have experienced in the Scottish Parliament in relation to ferries, as you might have seen. A decision was made about what was 拢90 million of spend at the time, although it is up to about 拢250 million now, and emails were frantically being searched for to find out exactly who gave the approval. I think it is wrong that we are trying to hunt about in email archives to find out who made a decision. Surely, there must be a better way of recording that. Perhaps there is, but it has just not been followed. I am trying to work out which it is.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Douglas Lumsden
You mentioned that there is an issue with skills. I want to work out what is going wrong. What can the Government learn from the situation, and what can it put in place to make things better? My question relates not so much to the skills agenda; it is more to do with the decisions that Government can make to improve the situation.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Douglas Lumsden
It was about the problem of due process.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Douglas Lumsden
Your submission contains some good examples in that respect鈥攜ou have mentioned the Forth crossing, and another example is Social Security Scotland鈥攂ut what has been on my mind recently is the proposal for the national care service, in which we are being asked to approve the allocation of quite a lot of money without there seeming to be a business case. Have you in Audit Scotland seen a business case for the national care service, or is that something that has been lacking?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Douglas Lumsden
You talk in your submission about evaluation being carried out post hoc鈥擨 think that that was the term that was used.