The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1965 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michael Marra
Thank you, convener鈥擨 appreciate it.
When you are engaging in these considerations, there may well be a lot of media coverage, as there was around the Sheku Bayoh inquiry. That inquiry was about something that happened in Kirkcaldy on one afternoon, and affected around 20 people directly鈥攊t is, of course, incredibly serious and worthy of investigation. The Covid inquiry was huge in scope and affected the entire country. However, there is a one-size-fits-all approach to inquiries.
Will the problems in the Sheku Bayoh inquiry be a point of reflection that the Cabinet will discuss after the inquiry concludes, in order to be able to say why the system is or is not working? In that inquiry, the system clearly has not worked; we can talk about all the different ways in which it has collapsed and the problems that it has had, setting aside the case for the inquiry itself. Will the Government discuss that and try to reflect on it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michael Marra
For the record, I begin by echoing Liz Smith鈥檚 comments due to my involvement in the Eljamel inquiry. In a similar way, I have presented my own evidence to the inquiry.
Given your statements today, Deputy First Minister, is the cost of 拢258.8 million too high?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michael Marra
However, in the end, these are Government decisions. As much as we can talk about it, and you are right to highlight the very legitimate concerns of people externally making the case, in the end, it is the Government that decides to have an inquiry and not to use the alternative processes. Therefore, the issue is really not about ignorance on the part of the public; it is a decision that has been taken by the Government, and it appoints the person who leads the inquiry. These are Government decisions, are they not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michael Marra
On your point about pace, we are five years on from the Covid inquiry, and two interim modules have been produced. You cannot really be satisfied with the pace of response if we are trying to learn lessons about a global pandemic, given that we might have another one in a month鈥檚 time.
The convener mentioned Covid inquiries elsewhere. The Covid inquiry in Australia was completed within two years, with a full set of recommendations. A pandemic could happen again, and we have already heard that 23,000 lives were lost during the Covid pandemic as a result of the suboptimal鈥攖o say the least鈥攔esponse from the Government. Surely the inquiry should happen an awful lot quicker so that we can learn lessons quickly. The system that we are using is not meeting the public need.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Michael Marra
That feels pretty fundamental to the operation of the policy. The bill is at stage 1 in its parliamentary process, but you think that a scheme could come forward that would allow for local operation. Would that not be a fundamental change to the way in which you, as Revenue Scotland, approached the issue in your work?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Michael Marra
There is probably a distinction to be made with regard to design: there is the design of the policy鈥攖hat is, what it actually does鈥攁nd then there is the design of your systems. It is worth clarifying that they are, in essence, two different things.
On the issue of timing, the legislative and policy development process for this levy feels very different to the process for the Scottish aggregates tax. I know that you have set out the reasons for some of that, but my point is that we, as a committee, were able to look at that tax and understand the mechanisms and its general impact, even though the rate had not yet been set. By the time that the committee had reached this stage of the process with that tax, it was pretty clear to us what we, as a country, were getting as a result of it.
This time, the process feels simultaneously very slow鈥攁fter all, we are eight and a half years on from Grenfell and the need to deal with this huge problem鈥攁nd incredibly rushed in the way that it has been pulled together at this point in the parliamentary session. Can you tell us about the contrast that you have found between the process of developing SAT and developing this tax?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Michael Marra
Do you anticipate that the advent of the levy funds will significantly accelerate that work?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Michael Marra
Mr Angus, could you repeat that into the microphone? I realise that you are giving advice to the minister on the hoof, but it would be good for us to hear it as well.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Michael Marra
But does that mean that there could be a risk of a lack of sensitivity to local circumstances? The evidence that we have had from house builders is that a one-size-fits-all approach across the country risks having an impact on very different housing markets鈥擡dinburgh versus the Highlands, for example. I understand your point about efficiency, but part of the trade-off will be greater sensitivity to local circumstances.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Michael Marra
Good afternoon, minister. The polluter-pays principle has been raised. Is the building safety levy a polluter-pays tax?