The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1574 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Michael Marra
I am keen to get observations from this work on the causality and the relationship with better outcomes. It is almost about the theory of change, if I could put it that way. There is the idea of having a commissioner, as understood by the people you spoke to, and the idea that it might produce better outcomes. I am asking you to comment not on the outcomes, but on the theory of change in terms of a person being appointed and the idea that things might get better.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Michael Marra
Page 6 of your report mentions the “accountability gap”. What is meant by that phrase?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Michael Marra
I will close with a question on the process of establishing a commissioner. You were almost a participant in that, in that you provided the background research on the idea that the Government department was approaching.
I was intrigued by the quote on page 9 of your report, which says that correspondents felt that
“the campaign for a commissioner had been done to their communities, not with them.”
That is evidence that you have taken and it probably speaks to some of the concerns that the committee expressed at the outset about the policy-making process of establishing a commissioner. Is it a politician’s idea or a third sector idea, rather than something that is based in the community of people that the commissioner is meant to be serving?
10:15Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Michael Marra
So as far as you could determine, none of the responses was based on people’s experience of other commissioners.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Michael Marra
Yes—I am wondering what that is. Your report mentions the need to
“bridge the gap between good intention and policy and practice on the ground”.
Is that what is meant by the “accountability gap”? I am trying to dig into the purpose of a commissioner, and I am not really sure what the point about the accountability mechanism means.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Michael Marra
That is fine.
Concerns have been raised that the establishment of a commissioner could be a drain on resource—in essence, it could be a substitution. Would we be better off spending the money on direct services or interventions rather than a commissioner? Did that come through in some of the evidence that you took?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Michael Marra
It also jumped out at me—I think that this point is coming through from the questions that my colleagues are asking—that you observe in the report that
“There is very little published research”
in this area and
“little evaluation exploring the pros and cons of different approaches”.
At the inquiry’s outset, we are working on the basis of there being very little published work exploring this area, and that is probably where you found yourself, too. Is that correct?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Michael Marra
I thank the witnesses for the really useful discussion so far. Given all that you have said and the content of the report, do you still believe that the 2030 target is credible?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Michael Marra
You say in the report that meeting the 2030 target
“would require technologies and other changes to be more advanced than set out in any of the CCC’s pathway scenarios to reach net zero”.
Just for clarity, are you saying that those technologies are not sufficiently advanced and that it is going to cost more money to do things with existing technologies?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Michael Marra
Just in closing, I would say that your observations on interoperability and the reliance on a collaborative approach between the UK and Scottish Governments, not least with regard to the fiscal trajectory that the country has to follow to meet these challenges, are absolutely right, but do you feel that institutions outside the fiscal framework are reflecting the same concerns? Do you think that ministers and senior civil servants are having these discussions about the scale of the challenge and how, between the devolved institutions and Whitehall, it might be met?