The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1965 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Michael Marra
You started the evidence session by talking about the issue of leadership, Auditor General, and the comment in the report about NHS Tayside having
“Limited skills and capacity for leading and participating in the”
whole-system change programme really jumps out. You have said that the board is trying to bring in a single member of staff to do that work, but can you say more about where that capacity and that capability are missing? Is it in the IJBs, or is it in the central leadership? What is the deficit that the board is trying to make up?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Michael Marra
Okay. Surely, given this changing environment, with different leadership over different periods of time, we should not be losing sight of those recommendations. They came out in 2020, and the progress report, which came back in 2021, has been described to me as
“the worst report in Scottish public life”.
As the convener has pointed out, it showed local bodies in Dundee misleading the public about progress that had not been made. We had the oversight assurance group in 2021, which reported in 2023, and now we have the whole system change programme.
All of that leads me to ask this question: do we not need external leadership to actually deliver this? The current model of leadership is just not working, is it?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Michael Marra
Is anybody reporting to the board on progress against those 51 recommendations in the report that was brought out? A lot of work went into that analysis. Are those things being reported on? I have to say that I cannot see any evidence that they are. They are being substituted by one programme after another, instead of someone saying, “This is the mission. We need to deliver it. How do we get there?” After all, we are now six years on.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Michael Marra
I want to stick with the issue of scope for a moment. Will the current scope of the whole system change programme meet the 51 recommendations of the Strang review?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Marra
I will close by returning to the issue of public spending, which of course you comment on quite regularly. I am thinking about two of your reports: one entitled, “NHS in Scotland 2025: Finance and performance”, and another, published more recently, in November, which is entitled, “The 2024/25 audit of NHS Tayside”. The picture that both reports paint is of a Government that is unable to change services. There does not seem to be a process whereby it can deliver change and efficiency on the public spending side. If you are looking at a tripod of issues around tax and growth, but the Government is focused on the third leg—spending decisions—and it is not able to deliver on those, is it not a key issue of concern if that is its principal focus and you, as Auditor General, keep telling the Parliament that it is not able to deliver change and manage public spending effectively?
10:45Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Marra
Returning to the mental health services side, I want to use that as an illustration of the Government’s inability to meet those broader targets. We have had report after report, including from yourselves, on such services, and the Government just seems to be unable to actually deliver change. What is the dysfunction that is resulting in that, when you tell us that that is the one factor that the Government identifies that it can use to control its massive budget black hole?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Marra
So, you do not see that directly in the documents; you are describing what might be called an absence. Have you any sense, from the Government’s other work, that it understands that this is a problem, or do you feel that it is pushing the problem away for political convenience?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Marra
I will maybe come back to the spending side of it. You also mentioned that such decisions would be supported by
“a more detailed assessment of the potential impact and timescales”
on taxation. Could you tell us a little more about what you mean by that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Marra
Auditor General, your report says:
“The Scottish Government, through its fiscal publications, has not done enough to explain why the potential funds raised from tax policy are so notably different from the net contribution to the Scottish Budget, and how it intends to address this.”
Why do you think that is?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Michael Marra
I suppose a fairly typical criticism of Governments in general, and their approach to taxation in particular, is that they are often more interested in the harvest rather than in growth in the first place. They use tax to plug the gap in their spending plans rather than thinking about how it might support the sustainability of the sector.
Liz Smith touched on issues about opportunity in certain areas and on thinking about the future. From the Government’s documentation, and the work that it has carried out, have you a sense that it is sensitive to the impact that its own tax measures might have on the performance of sectors in Scotland that might be weaker?