The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1574 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
Thank you for that, but it sounded like there was clarity and certainty in the permanent secretary’s answer: he said that the advice to ministers was that a direct award would not be legal. When was that advice provided?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
Do you think that it was prior to June last year?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
Mr Irwin?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
You understand where I am going with this. We have a nationalised yard, under the control of ministers, that produces a business plan that says that it will have a direct award, while the civil service is telling the Government that a direct award would be illegal. The Government has agreed both things simultaneously. That is the business plan that stands at the moment.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
My question is about the independence of the SFC, which you have mentioned, and it follows on from some of what Craig Hoy said. You say in the report that the nature of the SFC’s work
“and the possibility of a changed political landscape means that tensions could emerge. Were this to become a more significant risk to the effectiveness of the SFC at some point in the future then alternative arrangements should be considered”
around the funding of the institution. Can you say a bit more about what you see as being that “changed political landscape” and where tensions might emerge?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
That is useful to know. Your report suggests that the SFC could receive funding directly from the Scottish Parliament rather than the Scottish Government. The committee has done quite a bit of work on directly funded organisations, commissioners and so on. I do not want to put words in people’s mouths, but I would imagine that, for members around the table, the circumstances that you have described might be a concern. Which other models could increase the independence of institutions?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
Thanks for your evidence so far, permanent secretary. You began by saying that the Government has a good track record of balancing budgets. What is it about the past three years of emergency budgets that leads you to that conclusion?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
It is a bit of a stretch, really. We have had three years of significant interventions at the midpoint to rebalance the budget. Let us talk about the most recent intervention and the public sector pay policy. Did you advise the Government to set the policy at 3 per cent?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
That is for 2025-26 and the subsequent years, but you said that it should be 3 per cent for 2024-25. Was that not completely out of line with the rest of the public sector pay awards at the time?