The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1574 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
So, you admit that that was an error and that it should not have happened.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
I am trying to get to the overall approach that you have taken to the budget, in combination with the Cabinet and the First Minister, and I suppose that what this points to is that it feels like a paper exercise. Over the past three years, you have been setting a budget that contains some known false assumptions, waiting until the middle of the year and hoping that something comes along to bail you out. Would that be a fair characterisation?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
It is essentially what the SFC鈥檚 work on sustainability is pointing to as well.
Okay. I will leave that there and ask about higher education. Where in your risk register does the exposure of the higher education or university sector to international volatility sit?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
I am not talking about an institution; I am talking about the sector.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
Are there on-going discussions about the sector-wide issue?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
But, at that point, the OBR was projecting a far higher figure than 3 per cent. The Scottish Fiscal Commission projected 4.5 per cent, because the Scottish Government refused to provide it with the public sector pay policy. After the committee put pressure on the Government to do so, it eventually published the public sector pay policy in May last year, and that showed that there was an assumption of 3 per cent. Was that assumption of 3 per cent not completely unrealistic?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
It is useful to have that comment.
Since then, there has been some evidence that, beyond its being seen as unrealistic now, it was known to be unrealistic at the time, because the external environment made that clear. One of the cabinet secretaries, in evidence to the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee on 14 January, talked about conversations being had in Cabinet about the challenges around public sector pay and their being recognised. Why would you, as the chief financial officer for the Scottish Government, believe that a public pay policy of 3 per cent鈥攁 policy whose bandwidth amounts to over 50 per cent of the entire 拢60 billion-odd budget鈥攚as a reasonable assumption at that point?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
Would you say that the risk is high?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
And has it increased in recent years?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Michael Marra
My final question is about a separate issue that you mentioned. On Ferguson Marine, did you advise ministers that a direct award of the small vessel replacement programme to a Scottish yard would not be legal?