The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1090 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
That was helpful. So, the piece of research is not going to happen.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
Finally, I am interested in the real challenges around public debt and the legal options that are open to people to try to get themselves into a better position with the debt that they owe to public agencies. Very often, that will involve a degree of legal advice. I have spoken to firms in my region that do a lot of such work pro bono in order to try to support people, even if that just involves having an initial discussion with a counsellor or whoever about getting into a payment plan. Is that something that you have seen through your work?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
Good morning. I am particularly interested in the proposals that the Government had to reform legal aid. The intention was to bring forward proposals in this parliamentary session, but that has not happened and now will not happen. Building on the Evans review, the Government set up a number of working groups; my understanding is that the Law Society withdrew from those groups, and I am keen to understand the Law Society’s motivation and view in doing that.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
Aaliya, do you have anything to add on the need for primary legislation?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
Do you want to add anything, Hyo Eun Shin?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
We have referred to the committee’s work on reviewing the structure of legal aid. The Government has also committed to a review of the fees and a wider review of the legal aid system—we started to cover that in our conversation this morning.
I have two questions, the first of which is about the pace of change and the inquiries. Is all of that happening quickly enough? Secondly, what broad issues do you want to see captured in any system reform? I appreciate that it is big question, but it would be useful to get a sense of everyone’s view on it.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
Does Sophie Berry have anything to add from the Govan Law Centre’s point of view?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
Okay. That has been very useful.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
I will ask about some issues that we have started to touch on. The committee is interested in the availability of solicitors for this particular work and for legal aid work. It will be useful to get a sense of whether there is a lack of solicitors who are available to take on legal aid work in this area or whether there is a more general problem. The Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee has heard about a general lack of legal aid solicitors. It would be useful to hear your comments on the subject.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Paul O'Kane
I should probably have said at the outset that I am a member of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee, as is Ms McNair, so you will have to put up with questions from us in the coming weeks. It is an important demonstration of the synergy between the two inquiries.
In looking at the Regulation of Legal Services (Scotland) Bill, the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee examined the definition of “solicitor” and how we can ensure that people get access to appropriate legal advice. Have you any sense of whether women who are leaving violent and abusive relationships are going to the right places to get support? We know about the work that is done with partners such as Scottish Women’s Aid to direct people to the right places, but are there any examples of people having been given poor advice or having been unable to access a solicitor to get legal recourse?